These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17097214)

  • 1. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results.
    Menon M; Shrivastava A; Kaul S; Badani KK; Fumo M; Bhandari M; Peabody JO
    Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):648-57; discussion 657-8. PubMed ID: 17097214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients.
    Kaul S; Savera A; Badani K; Fumo M; Bhandari A; Menon M
    BJU Int; 2006 Mar; 97(3):467-72. PubMed ID: 16469009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Vattikuti institute prostatectomy (VIP) and current results].
    Bhandari M; Menon M
    Arch Esp Urol; 2007 May; 60(4):397-407. PubMed ID: 17626532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation.
    Chien GW; Mikhail AA; Orvieto MA; Zagaja GP; Sokoloff MH; Brendler CB; Shalhav AL
    Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):419-23. PubMed ID: 16040100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques.
    Menon M; Kaul S; Bhandari A; Shrivastava A; Tewari A; Hemal A
    J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2291-6, discussion 2296. PubMed ID: 16280816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
    Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: an outcomes-based evolution.
    Harris MJ
    Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 17084506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.
    Carini M; Masieri L; Minervini A; Lapini A; Serni S
    Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 17683854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current technique of open intrafascial nerve-sparing retropubic prostatectomy.
    Budäus L; Isbarn H; Schlomm T; Heinzer H; Haese A; Steuber T; Salomon G; Huland H; Graefen M
    Eur Urol; 2009 Aug; 56(2):317-24. PubMed ID: 19501454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of statin therapy on early return of potency after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Hong SK; Han BK; Jeong SJ; Byun SS; Lee SE
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):613-6. PubMed ID: 17570410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The technique of apical dissection of the prostate and urethrovesical anastomosis in robotic radical prostatectomy.
    Menon M; Hemal AK; Tewari A; Shrivastava A; Bhandari A
    BJU Int; 2004 Apr; 93(6):715-9. PubMed ID: 15049978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases.
    Menon M; Tewari A; Peabody JO; Shrivastava A; Kaul S; Bhandari A; Hemal AK
    Urol Clin North Am; 2004 Nov; 31(4):701-17. PubMed ID: 15474597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting erectile function after radical retropubic prostatectomy: results from 1620 consecutive patients.
    Ayyathurai R; Manoharan M; Nieder AM; Kava B; Soloway MS
    BJU Int; 2008 Apr; 101(7):833-6. PubMed ID: 18190627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy?
    Marien TP; Lepor H
    BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1581-4. PubMed ID: 18808410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    Tewari AK; Srivastava A; Huang MW; Robinson BD; Shevchuk MM; Durand M; Sooriakumaran P; Grover S; Yadav R; Mishra N; Mohan S; Brooks DC; Shaikh N; Khanna A; Leung R
    BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):984-92. PubMed ID: 21917101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique.
    Menon M; Tewari A; Peabody J;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2289-92. PubMed ID: 12771773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single institution 2-year patient reported validated sexual function outcomes after nerve sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Rodriguez E; Finley DS; Skarecky D; Ahlering TE
    J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 19013596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: a contemporary and anatomic approach.
    Harris MJ; Thompson IM
    Urology; 1996 Nov; 48(5):762-8. PubMed ID: 8911522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures.
    Badani KK; Kaul S; Menon M
    Cancer; 2007 Nov; 110(9):1951-8. PubMed ID: 17893904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.