195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17097333)
1. 3D prostate model formation from non-parallel 2D ultrasound biopsy images.
Cool D; Downey D; Izawa J; Chin J; Fenster A
Med Image Anal; 2006 Dec; 10(6):875-87. PubMed ID: 17097333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of image registration accuracy in three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
Karnik VV; Fenster A; Bax J; Cool DW; Gardi L; Gyacskov I; Romagnoli C; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):802-13. PubMed ID: 20229890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Temporal-based needle segmentation algorithm for transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy procedures.
Cool DW; Gardi L; Romagnoli C; Saikaly M; Izawa JI; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1660-73. PubMed ID: 20443487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design and evaluation of a 3D transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy system.
Cool D; Sherebrin S; Izawa J; Chin J; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4695-707. PubMed ID: 18975715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic prostate segmentation using deep learning on clinically diverse 3D transrectal ultrasound images.
Orlando N; Gillies DJ; Gyacskov I; Romagnoli C; D'Souza D; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(6):2413-2426. PubMed ID: 32166768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the utility of intraprocedural 3D TRUS image information in guiding registration for displacement compensation during prostate biopsy.
De Silva T; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):082901. PubMed ID: 25086558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 2D-3D rigid registration to compensate for prostate motion during 3D TRUS-guided biopsy.
De Silva T; Fenster A; Cool DW; Gardi L; Romagnoli C; Samarabandu J; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):022904. PubMed ID: 23387775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technique for a hybrid system of real-time transrectal ultrasound with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the guidance of targeted prostate biopsy.
Ukimura O; Hirahara N; Fujihara A; Yamada T; Iwata T; Kamoi K; Okihara K; Ito H; Nishimura T; Miki T
Int J Urol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):890-3. PubMed ID: 20812938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeat prostate biopsy accuracy: simulator-based comparison of two- and three-dimensional transrectal US modalities.
Cool DW; Connolly MJ; Sherebrin S; Eagleson R; Izawa JI; Amann J; Romagnoli C; Romano WM; Fenster A
Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):587-94. PubMed ID: 20093529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adaptation of a 3D prostate cancer atlas for transrectal ultrasound guided target-specific biopsy.
Narayanan R; Werahera PN; Barqawi A; Crawford ED; Shinohara K; Simoneau AR; Suri JS
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(20):N397-406. PubMed ID: 18827317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical modeling constrained surface-based image registration for prostate MR guided TRUS biopsy.
van de Ven WJ; Hu Y; Barentsz JO; Karssemeijer N; Barratt D; Huisman HJ
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2470-81. PubMed ID: 25979040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Real-time registration of 3D to 2D ultrasound images for image-guided prostate biopsy.
Gillies DJ; Gardi L; De Silva T; Zhao SR; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4708-4723. PubMed ID: 28666058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of prostate voxels identified as suspicious of malignancy on three-dimensional (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging in patients with abnormal digital rectal examination or raised prostate specific antigen level of 4-10 ng/ml.
Kumar V; Jagannathan NR; Kumar R; Thulkar S; Gupta SD; Hemal AK; Gupta NP
NMR Biomed; 2007 Feb; 20(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 16894640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system.
Bax J; Cool D; Gardi L; Knight K; Smith D; Montreuil J; Sherebrin S; Romagnoli C; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5397-410. PubMed ID: 19175099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D surface-based registration of ultrasound and histology in prostate cancer imaging.
Schalk SG; Postema A; Saidov TA; Demi L; Smeenge M; de la Rosette JJ; Wijkstra H; Mischi M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2016 Jan; 47():29-39. PubMed ID: 26647110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of prostate deformation due to needle insertion during TRUS-guided biopsy: comparison of hand-held and mechanically stabilized systems.
De Silva T; Fenster A; Bax J; Romagnoli C; Izawa J; Samarabandu J; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 21520885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional prostate segmentation using level set with shape constraint based on rotational slices for 3D end-firing TRUS guided biopsy.
Qiu W; Yuan J; Ukwatta E; Tessier D; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):072903. PubMed ID: 23822454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigating 3D tumor distribution for optimized diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Zeng J; Bauer JJ; Yao X; Zhang W; McLeod DG; Sesterhenn IA; Connelly RR; Moul JW; Mun SK
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 70():392-8. PubMed ID: 10977580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D Navigo™ versus TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in prostate cancer detection.
Gayet M; van der Aa A; Schmitz P; Beerlage HP; Schrier BP; Mulders PF; Mischi M; Wijkstra H
World J Urol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):1255-60. PubMed ID: 26847183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Needle segmentation using 3D Hough transform in 3D TRUS guided prostate transperineal therapy.
Qiu W; Yuchi M; Ding M; Tessier D; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):042902. PubMed ID: 23556924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
