These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17097423)

  • 1. Does the accuracy of single reading with CAD (computer-aided detection) compare with that of double reading?: A review of the literature.
    Bennett RL; Blanks RG; Moss SM
    Clin Radiol; 2006 Dec; 61(12):1023-8. PubMed ID: 17097423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography: a detailed comparison of computer-aided detection-assisted single reading and double reading.
    Cawson JN; Nickson C; Amos A; Hill G; Whan AB; Kavanagh AM
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Oct; 53(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 19788479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms.
    Gromet M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):854-9. PubMed ID: 18356428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
    James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW
    Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does computer-aided detection have a role in the arbitration of discordant double-reading opinions in a breast-screening programme?
    James JJ; Cornford EJ
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Jan; 64(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 19070697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early detection of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening.
    Houssami N; Given-Wilson R; Ciatto S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Apr; 53(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 19527363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The efficacy of using computer-aided detection (CAD) for detection of breast cancer in mammography screening: a systematic review.
    Henriksen EL; Carlsen JF; Vejborg IM; Nielsen MB; Lauridsen CA
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Jan; 60(1):13-18. PubMed ID: 29665706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate.
    Taylor P; Potts HW
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Apr; 44(6):798-807. PubMed ID: 18353630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness analysis for breast cancer screening: double reading versus single + CAD reading.
    Sato M; Kawai M; Nishino Y; Shibuya D; Ohuchi N; Ishibashi T
    Breast Cancer; 2014 Sep; 21(5):532-41. PubMed ID: 23104393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single reading with computer-aided detection performed by selected radiologists in a breast cancer screening program.
    Bargalló X; Santamaría G; Del Amo M; Arguis P; Ríos J; Grau J; Burrel M; Cores E; Velasco M
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Nov; 83(11):2019-23. PubMed ID: 25193778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided detection in mammography.
    Astley SM; Gilbert FJ
    Clin Radiol; 2004 May; 59(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 15081844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography.
    Gilbert FJ; Astley SM; Gillan MG; Agbaje OF; Wallis MG; James J; Boggis CR; Duffy SW;
    N Engl J Med; 2008 Oct; 359(16):1675-84. PubMed ID: 18832239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of standard reading and computer aided diagnosis (CAD) on a proficiency test of screening mammography.
    Ciatto S; Brancato B; Rosselli Del Turco M; Risso G; Catarzi S; Morrone D; Bricolo D; Zappa M
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):59-65. PubMed ID: 12951552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is computer aided detection (CAD) cost effective in screening mammography? A model based on the CADET II study.
    Guerriero C; Gillan MG; Cairns J; Wallis MG; Gilbert FJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2011 Jan; 11():11. PubMed ID: 21241473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study.
    Khoo LA; Taylor P; Given-Wilson RM
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 16244252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review.
    Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M; Burke P; Visioli C; Paci E; Zappa M
    Br J Cancer; 2003 Nov; 89(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 14583763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is single reading with computer-aided detection (CAD) as good as double reading in mammography screening? A systematic review.
    Azavedo E; Zackrisson S; Mejàre I; Heibert Arnlind M
    BMC Med Imaging; 2012 Jul; 12():22. PubMed ID: 22827803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
    Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography.
    Georgian-Smith D; Moore RH; Halpern E; Yeh ED; Rafferty EA; D'Alessandro HA; Staffa M; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; Kopans DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1135-41. PubMed ID: 17954651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.