220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17098174)
1. Breast MR imaging in the diagnostic setting.
Schnall M; Orel S
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Aug; 14(3):329-37, vi. PubMed ID: 17098174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection.
Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Clin Radiol; 2001 Apr; 56(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 11286578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Who should have breast magnetic resonance imaging evaluation?
Orel S
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Feb; 26(5):703-11. PubMed ID: 18258977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain.
Tumyan L; Hoyt AC; Bassett LW
Breast J; 2005; 11(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 16174154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR imaging in the evaluation of equivocal clinical and imaging findings of the breast.
Leung JW
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2010 May; 18(2):295-308, ix-x. PubMed ID: 20494313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Magnetic resonance versus traditional breast imaging in solid nodular diseases of the breast].
Ercolani P; Giuseppetti GM; Greco A; Manna P; Baldassarre S; Giovagnoni A; De Nigris E; Amici F
Radiol Med; 1994; 87(1-2):36-40. PubMed ID: 8128030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of imaging in diagnosis of carcinoma of breast.
Ahmed R; Ali SM
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Apr; 15(4):238-41. PubMed ID: 15857599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast MR imaging: current indications and advanced imaging techniques.
Weinstein S; Rosen M
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):1013-42. PubMed ID: 20868898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effort, accuracy and histology of MR-guided vacuum biopsy of suspicious breast lesions--retrospective evaluation after 389 interventions].
Fischer U; Schwethelm L; Baum FT; Luftner-Nagel S; Teubner J
Rofo; 2009 Aug; 181(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 19582655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Concepts for differential diagnosis in breast MR imaging.
Kuhl CK
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Aug; 14(3):305-28, v. PubMed ID: 17098173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast masses. Appropriate evaluation.
Evans WP
Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1085-108. PubMed ID: 7480658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast cancer: pre- and postoperative imaging for staging.
Hansen NM; Growney A
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2007 Apr; 16(2):447-63. PubMed ID: 17560522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography imaging in the diagnosis of breast tumors].
Iakovleva EK; Tiutin LA; Tikhova KE; Pozdniakov AV; Shelkoplias EN
Vopr Onkol; 2008; 54(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 18942398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An imaging approach to high-risk screening for breast cancer.
Jochelson MS; Morris EA
Semin Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 21134530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Value of MR-guided localization and biopsy in breast lesions].
Obenauer S; Grabbe E; Knollmann F
Rofo; 2006 May; 178(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 16708322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR intervention: indications, technique, correlation and histologic.
Philpotts LE
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2010 May; 18(2):323-32, x. PubMed ID: 20494315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Indications for MR mammography. A Belgian study.
Van Goethem M; Biltjes IG; De Schepper AM
JBR-BTR; 2000 Jun; 83(3):126-9. PubMed ID: 11025925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
