219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17098206)
1. Visual experiences during different stages of LASIK: Zyoptix XP microkeratome vs Intralase femtosecond laser.
Tan CS; Au Eong KG; Lee HM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 17098206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.
Patel SV; Maguire LJ; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1482-90. PubMed ID: 17350688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis.
Lim T; Yang S; Kim M; Tchah H
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 May; 141(5):833-9. PubMed ID: 16678504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study.
Durrie DS; Kezirian GM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 15721704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of corneal flap thickness between primary eyes and fellow eyes using the Zyoptix XP microkeratome.
Ho T; Cheng AC; Lau S; Lam DS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2049-53. PubMed ID: 18053902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Corneal architecture of femtosecond laser and microkeratome flaps imaged by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
von Jagow B; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19101422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis.
Kezirian GM; Stonecipher KG
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Apr; 30(4):804-11. PubMed ID: 15093642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratomes for flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis and effect of postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thickness.
Rosa AM; Neto Murta J; Quadrado MJ; Tavares C; Lobo C; Van Velze R; Castanheira-Dinis A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):833-8. PubMed ID: 19393881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.
Ortiz D; Alió JL; Piñero D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 18242446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1-year follow-up.
Buzzonetti L; Petrocelli G; Valente P; Tamburrelli C; Mosca L; Laborante A; Balestrazzi E
Cornea; 2008 Feb; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18216572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in the refractive index of the human corneal stroma during laser in situ keratomileusis. Effects of exposure time and method used to create the flap.
Patel S; Alió JL; Artola A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1077-82. PubMed ID: 18571072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complications of LASIK flaps made by the IntraLase 15- and 30-kHz femtosecond lasers.
Haft P; Yoo SH; Kymionis GD; Ide T; O'Brien TP; Culbertson WW
J Refract Surg; 2009 Nov; 25(11):979-84. PubMed ID: 19921765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laser in situ keratomileusis in myopic patients with congenital nystagmus.
Mahler O; Hirsh A; Kremer I; Barequet IS; Marcovich AL; Nemet P; Levinger S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Mar; 32(3):464-7. PubMed ID: 16631059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of hinge position on corneal sensation and dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser.
Mian SI; Shtein RM; Nelson A; Musch DC
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1190-4. PubMed ID: 17586374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the corneal response to laser in situ keratomileusis with flap creation using the FS15 and FS30 femtosecond lasers: clinical and confocal microscopy findings.
Hu MY; McCulley JP; Cavanagh HD; Bowman RW; Verity SM; Mootha VV; Petroll WM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):673-81. PubMed ID: 17397742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.
Kalyvianaki MI; Kymionis GD; Kounis GA; Panagopoulou SI; Grentzelos MA; Pallikaris IG
Ophthalmology; 2008 Dec; 115(12):2174-80. PubMed ID: 19041475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient and surgeon experience during laser in situ keratomileusis using 2 femtosecond laser systems.
Hall RC; Rosman M; Chan C; Tan DT; Mehta JS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):423-9. PubMed ID: 24461333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of hinge position and depth plate on the rate of recovery of corneal sensation following LASIK.
Nassaralla BA; McLeod SD; Boteon JE; Nassaralla JJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 15652836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What can patients see during glaucoma filtration surgery under peribulbar anesthesia?
Riad W; Tan CS; Kumar CM; Au Eong KG
J Glaucoma; 2006 Oct; 15(5):462-5. PubMed ID: 16988611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of hinge position on corneal sensation and dry eye after LASIK.
Donnenfeld ED; Solomon K; Perry HD; Doshi SJ; Ehrenhaus M; Solomon R; Biser S
Ophthalmology; 2003 May; 110(5):1023-9; discussion 1029-30. PubMed ID: 12750107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
