188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17098263)
1. Neural correlates of foveal splitting in reading: evidence from an ERP study of Chinese character recognition.
Hsiao JH; Shillcock R; Lee CY
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(6):1280-92. PubMed ID: 17098263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Foveal splitting causes differential processing of Chinese orthography in the male and female brain.
Hsiao JH; Shillcock R
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):531-6. PubMed ID: 16154326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual Similarity of Words Alone Can Modulate Hemispheric Lateralization in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence From Modeling Chinese Character Recognition.
Hsiao JH; Cheung K
Cogn Sci; 2016 Mar; 40(2):351-72. PubMed ID: 25818722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A TMS examination of semantic radical combinability effects in Chinese character recognition.
Hsiao JH; Shillcock R; Lavidor M
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):159-67. PubMed ID: 16499892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Position of phonetic components may influence how written words are processed in the brain: Evidence from Chinese phonetic compound pronunciation.
Hsiao JH; Liu T
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 10(4):552-9. PubMed ID: 21098814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ERP evidence for the split fovea theory.
Martin CD; Thierry G; Démonet JF; Roberts M; Nazir T
Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1185():212-20. PubMed ID: 17956755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chinese character recognition in mirror reading: evidence from event-related potential.
Zhang Y; Qiu J; Huang H; Zhang Q; Bao B
Int J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 44(5):360-8. PubMed ID: 22029614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition.
Jordan TR; Fuggetta G; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e23957. PubMed ID: 21935368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hemispheric asymmetries in the split-fovea model of semantic processing.
Monaghan P; Shillcock R; McDonald S
Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):339-54. PubMed ID: 14967217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A magnetic stimulation examination of orthographic neighborhood effects in visual word recognition.
Lavidor M; Walsh V
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):354-63. PubMed ID: 12729488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of brain mechanisms underlying the processing of Chinese characters and pseudo-characters: an event-related potential study.
Wang T; Li H; Zhang Q; Tu S; Yu C; Qiu J
Int J Psychol; 2010 Apr; 45(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22043890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Split Fovea Theory and the Leicester critique: what do the data say?
Van der Haegen L; Drieghe D; Brysbaert M
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 19698725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coarse and fine N1 tuning for print in younger and older Chinese children: Orthography, phonology, or semantics driven?
Tong X; Lo JCM; McBride C; Ho CS; Waye MMY; Chung KKH; Wong SWL; Chow BW
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():109-119. PubMed ID: 27507119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual field differences in visual word recognition can emerge purely from perceptual learning: evidence from modeling Chinese character pronunciation.
Hsiao JH
Brain Lang; 2011 Nov; 119(2):89-98. PubMed ID: 21620456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The importance of interhemispheric transfer for foveal vision: a factor that has been overlooked in theories of visual word recognition and object perception.
Brysbaert M
Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 14967210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemispheric processing of lexical information in Chinese character recognition and its relationship to reading performance.
Zhou W; Gao Y; Chang Y; Su M
J Gen Psychol; 2019; 146(1):34-49. PubMed ID: 30632925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
