These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17098574)

  • 1. The publication process itself was the major cause of publication bias in genetic epidemiology.
    Calnan M; Smith GD; Sterne JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1312-8. PubMed ID: 17098574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The researchers themselves must force through a reform of the publishing system].
    Ramel B
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Jun; 100(25):2230-3. PubMed ID: 12872514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors.
    Rivara FP; Cummings P; Ringold S; Bergman AB; Joffe A; Christakis DA
    J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 17643779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do journals have a publication bias?
    Pickar JH
    Maturitas; 2007 May; 57(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 17376614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bad papers by Caveman.
    J Cell Sci; 2005 Mar; 118(Pt 6):1103-4. PubMed ID: 15764593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Peer review: a closed system in need of reform].
    Thörn A
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3106-8. PubMed ID: 12198928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review: purpose, process and publication.
    Thistlethwaite J
    Clin Teach; 2012 Aug; 9(4):201-4. PubMed ID: 22783849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: a study of papers submitted to epidemiology.
    Hall SA; Wilcox AJ
    Epidemiology; 2007 Mar; 18(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 17301708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals.
    Tutarel O
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Jan; 4():3. PubMed ID: 14733618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing publication bias through trial registration.
    Abaid LN; Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1434-7. PubMed ID: 17540818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing publication bias of prospective clinical trials through trial registration.
    Abaid LN; Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Contraception; 2007 Nov; 76(5):339-41. PubMed ID: 17963856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What do the JAMA editors say when they discuss manuscripts that they are considering for publication? Developing a schema for classifying the content of editorial discussion.
    Dickersin K; Ssemanda E; Mansell C; Rennie D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Sep; 7():44. PubMed ID: 17894854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suggesting reviewers.
    Carmichael SW; Agur AM; Seifert MF; Spinner RJ; Tubbs RS; McDonald S; Nicholson H; Lachman N
    Clin Anat; 2006 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 16342266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Not for your eyes: information concealed through publication bias.
    Kittisupamongkol W
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 147(3):558; author reply 558-9. PubMed ID: 19217959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Not for your eyes: information concealed through publication bias.
    Liesegang TJ; Albert DM; Schachat AP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Nov; 146(5):638-40. PubMed ID: 18984084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Publication of clinical trials in scientific journals: editorial issues].
    Alfonso F; Segovia J; Heras M; Bermejo J
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2006 Nov; 59(11):1206-14. PubMed ID: 17697666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
    Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical research projects at a German medical faculty: follow-up from ethical approval to publication and citation by others.
    Blümle A; Antes G; Schumacher M; Just H; von Elm E
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Sep; 34(9):e20. PubMed ID: 18757621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers.
    Tijdink JK; Schipper K; Bouter LM; Maclaine Pont P; de Jonge J; Smulders YM
    BMJ Open; 2016 Feb; 6(2):e008681. PubMed ID: 26888726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.