These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17098574)

  • 21. Peer review warts and all.
    Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):679. PubMed ID: 15280874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data.
    Dickersin K
    AIDS Educ Prev; 1997 Feb; 9(1 Suppl):15-21. PubMed ID: 9083596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Publication bias in the clinical drug research].
    Keränen T; Ylitalo P
    Duodecim; 1999; 115(17):1828-32. PubMed ID: 11941650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Editorial policies and publication bias: the importance of negative studies.
    Sridharan L; Greenland P
    Arch Intern Med; 2009 Jun; 169(11):1022-3. PubMed ID: 19506169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Publication ethics.
    Morton NS
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Oct; 19(10):1011-3. PubMed ID: 19619189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Scientific publishing. A cure for the common trial.
    Grimm D
    Science; 2006 May; 312(5775):835-7. PubMed ID: 16690831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Freedom of expression and editorial independence: Four firings and a Kafkanian process].
    Gøtzsche PC
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Apr; 170(18):1537-8. PubMed ID: 18454921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reducing the costs of peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 11(4):375. PubMed ID: 18368038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Revealing the faults in medical journals.
    Liesegang TJ
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 19333735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using journal impact factors to correct for the publication bias of medical studies.
    Baker R; Jackson D
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):785-92. PubMed ID: 16984321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A case study of publication bias in an influential series of reviews of drug education.
    McCambridge J
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2007 Sep; 26(5):463-8. PubMed ID: 17701508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Journals should publish all "null" results and should sparingly publish "positive" results.
    Ioannidis JP
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):186. PubMed ID: 16434613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prevention of false positive findings in observational studies: registration will not work but replication might.
    de Jonge P; Conradi HJ; Thombs BD; Rosmalen JG; Burger H; Ormel J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2011 Feb; 65(2):95-6. PubMed ID: 21113013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine.
    Stamm T; Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Kleinheinz J; Cehreli M; Cehreli ZC
    Head Face Med; 2007 Jun; 3():27. PubMed ID: 17562003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Publishing in English-language journals.
    Davis AJ; Tschudin V
    Nurs Ethics; 2007 May; 14(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 17459824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist.
    Tricco AC; Pham B; Brehaut J; Tetroe J; Cappelli M; Hopewell S; Lavis JN; Berlin JA; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):617-623.e5. PubMed ID: 19162440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Five direct questions to Josef Milerad concerning credibility].
    Holmgren PG
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Jan; 100(5):346, 349. PubMed ID: 12607383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Duplicate submission, redundant publication and plagiarism are under control].
    Léger P
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Jun; 110(3):125-6. PubMed ID: 19481679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How a submitted manuscript is processed.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):853-5; quiz 856. PubMed ID: 19787169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
    Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.