BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17099128)

  • 1. Measuring managed care and its environment using national surveys: a review and assessment.
    Liang SY; Phillips KA; Haas JS
    Med Care Res Rev; 2006 Dec; 63(6 Suppl):9S-36S. PubMed ID: 17099128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On modelling response propensity for dwelling unit (DU) level non-response adjustment in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).
    Wun LM; Ezzati-Rice TM; Diaz-Tena N; Greenblatt J
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(8):1875-84. PubMed ID: 17206601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Studying the effects of health plan competition: are available data resources up to the task?
    Mark TL; Coffey RM
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Apr; 36(1 Pt 2):253-75. PubMed ID: 11327176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do for-profit health plans restrict access to care under Medicaid managed care?
    Long SK
    Med Care Res Rev; 2008 Oct; 65(5):638-48. PubMed ID: 18434296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating health plan quality 2: survey design principles for measuring health plan quality.
    Wholey DR; Christianson JB; Finch M; Knutson D; Rockwood T; Warrick L;
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jun; 9 Spec No 2():SP65-75. PubMed ID: 12822716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The medical expenditure panel survey: a national information resource to support healthcare cost research and inform policy and practice.
    Cohen JW; Cohen SB; Banthin JS
    Med Care; 2009 Jul; 47(7 Suppl 1):S44-50. PubMed ID: 19536015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Commercial plans in Medicaid managed care: understanding who stays and who leaves.
    Long SK; Yemane A
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2005; 24(4):1084-94. PubMed ID: 16012149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of managed care on use of health care services: results from two contemporaneous household surveys.
    Deb P; Li C; Trivedi PK; Zimmer DM
    Health Econ; 2006 Jul; 15(7):743-60. PubMed ID: 16523440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design strategies and innovations in the medical expenditure panel survey.
    Cohen SB
    Med Care; 2003 Jul; 41(7 Suppl):III5-III12. PubMed ID: 12865722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Market and beneficiary characteristics associated with enrollment in Medicare managed care plans and fee-for-service.
    Shimada SL; Zaslavsky AM; Zaborski LB; O'Malley AJ; Heller A; Cleary PD
    Med Care; 2009 May; 47(5):517-23. PubMed ID: 19365291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medicaid managed care and the distribution of societal costs for persons with severe mental illness.
    Shern DL; Jones K; Chen HJ; Jordan N; Ramoni-Perazzi J; Boothroyd RA
    Am J Psychiatry; 2008 Feb; 165(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 18198269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Managed care organizations' performance in delivery of adolescent immunizations, HEDIS, 1999-2002.
    Bardenheier BH; Groom H; Zhou F; Kong Y; Shefer AM; Stokley SK; Shih SC
    J Adolesc Health; 2008 Feb; 42(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 18207091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stakeholder perceptions of quality in managed care plans.
    Thompson JM
    Manag Care Q; 2003; 11(2):12-21. PubMed ID: 12968438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gender disparities in cardiovascular disease care among commercial and medicare managed care plans.
    Chou AF; Wong L; Weisman CS; Chan S; Bierman AS; Correa-de-Araujo R; Scholle SH
    Womens Health Issues; 2007; 17(3):139-49. PubMed ID: 17481918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality monitoring and management in commercial health plans.
    Landon BE; Rosenthal MB; Normand SL; Frank RG; Epstein AM
    Am J Manag Care; 2008 Jun; 14(6):377-86. PubMed ID: 18554076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of administrative-only versus administrative plus chart review data for reporting HEDIS hybrid measures.
    Pawlson LG; Scholle SH; Powers A
    Am J Manag Care; 2007 Oct; 13(10):553-8. PubMed ID: 17927459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Congestive heart failure disease management in Medicare-managed care.
    Mehrotra A; McNeil BJ; Landon BE
    Am Heart J; 2007 Dec; 154(6):1153-9. PubMed ID: 18035089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment, authorization and access to medicaid managed mental health care.
    Masland MC; Snowden LR; Wallace NT
    Adm Policy Ment Health; 2007 Nov; 34(6):548-62. PubMed ID: 17929160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Plans that opted out. Many managed-care plans don't like how they're measured.
    Comarow A
    US News World Rep; 1998 Oct; 125(13):77-8. PubMed ID: 10186431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The utility of prediction models to oversample the long-term uninsured.
    Cohen SB; Yu WW
    Med Care; 2009 Jan; 47(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 19106735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.