186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17099208)
1. Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF.
Fiddelers AA; Severens JL; Dirksen CD; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Evers JL
Hum Reprod Update; 2007; 13(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17099208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single versus double embryo transfer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial.
Fiddelers AA; van Montfoort AP; Dirksen CD; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Dunselman GA; Janssen JM; Severens JL; Evers JL
Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2090-7. PubMed ID: 16613886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of seven IVF strategies: results of a Markov decision-analytic model.
Fiddelers AA; Dirksen CD; Dumoulin JC; van Montfoort AP; Land JA; Janssen JM; Evers JL; Severens JL
Hum Reprod; 2009 Jul; 24(7):1648-55. PubMed ID: 19318703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI.
Veleva Z; Karinen P; Tomás C; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2009 Jul; 24(7):1632-9. PubMed ID: 19318704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles.
van Montfoort AP; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Coonen E; Derhaag JG; Evers JL
Hum Reprod; 2005 Feb; 20(2):433-6. PubMed ID: 15550492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of embryo transfer strategies: a decision analytic model using long-term costs and consequences of singletons and multiples born as a consequence of IVF.
van Heesch MM; van Asselt AD; Evers JL; van der Hoeven MA; Dumoulin JC; van Beijsterveldt CE; Bonsel GJ; Dykgraaf RH; van Goudoever JB; Koopman-Esseboom C; Nelen WL; Steiner K; Tamminga P; Tonch N; Torrance HL; Dirksen CD
Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2527-2540. PubMed ID: 27907897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Kjellberg AT; Carlsson P; Bergh C
Hum Reprod; 2006 Jan; 21(1):210-6. PubMed ID: 16172148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reducing twin pregnancy rates after IVF--elective single embryo transfer (eSET).
Milne P; Cottell E; Allen C; Spillane H; Vasallo J; Wingfield M
Ir Med J; 2010 Jan; 103(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 20222385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization.
Min JK; Hughes E; Young D; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):363-377. PubMed ID: 20500945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
van Montfoort AP; Fiddelers AA; Janssen JM; Derhaag JG; Dirksen CD; Dunselman GA; Land JA; Geraedts JP; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC
Hum Reprod; 2006 Feb; 21(2):338-43. PubMed ID: 16253973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles.
Gerris J; De Sutter P; De Neubourg D; Van Royen E; Vander Elst J; Mangelschots K; Vercruyssen M; Kok P; Elseviers M; Annemans L; Pauwels P; Dhont M
Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 14990547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40-44 years.
Niinimäki M; Suikkari AM; Mäkinen S; Söderström-Anttila V; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 23175499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years.
Veleva Z; Vilska S; Hydén-Granskog C; Tiitinen A; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2098-102. PubMed ID: 16740524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
Lukassen HG; Braat DD; Wetzels AM; Zielhuis GA; Adang EM; Scheenjes E; Kremer JA
Hum Reprod; 2005 Mar; 20(3):702-8. PubMed ID: 15618254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. IVF with planned single-embryo transfer versus IUI with ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained subfertility: an economic analysis.
van Rumste MM; Custers IM; van Wely M; Koks CA; van Weering HG; Beckers NG; Scheffer GJ; Broekmans FJ; Hompes PG; Mochtar MH; van der Veen F; Mol BW
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 24456703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. eSET irrespective of the availability of a good-quality embryo in the first cycle only is not effective in reducing overall twin pregnancy rates.
van Montfoort AP; Fiddelers AA; Land JA; Dirksen CD; Severens JL; Geraedts JP; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC
Hum Reprod; 2007 Jun; 22(6):1669-74. PubMed ID: 17416915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of different embryo transfer strategies in England.
Dixon S; Faghih Nasiri F; Ledger WL; Lenton EA; Duenas A; Sutcliffe P; Chilcott JB
BJOG; 2008 May; 115(6):758-66. PubMed ID: 18355368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: a randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint.
Polinder S; Heijnen EM; Macklon NS; Habbema JD; Fauser BJ; Eijkemans MJ
Hum Reprod; 2008 Feb; 23(2):316-23. PubMed ID: 18033807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determinants of the choice for single or double embryo transfer in twin prone couples.
Van Peperstraten AM; Kreuwel IA; Hermens RP; Nelen WL; Van Dop PA; Grol RP; Kremer JA
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 18231893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single embryo transfer is an option in frozen embryo transfer.
Hydén-Granskog C; Unkila-Kallio L; Halttunen M; Tiitinen A
Hum Reprod; 2005 Oct; 20(10):2935-8. PubMed ID: 15980000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
