273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17099402)
1. Estimation of health risks associated with occupational radiation exposure: addressing measurement error and minimum detectable exposure level.
Xue X; Kim MY; Shore RE
Health Phys; 2006 Dec; 91(6):582-91. PubMed ID: 17099402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A method for estimating occupational radiation dose to individuals, using weekly dosimetry data.
Mitchell TJ; Ostrouchov G; Frome EL; Kerr GD
Radiat Res; 1997 Feb; 147(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 9008212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maximum likelihood estimates of mean and variance of occupation radiation doses subjected to minimum detection levels.
Datta D; Singh S; Johnson BE; Kushwaha HS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 18083720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: study of errors in dosimetry.
Thierry-Chef I; Marshall M; Fix JJ; Bermann F; Gilbert ES; Hacker C; Heinmiller B; Murray W; Pearce MS; Utterback D; Bernar K; Deboodt P; Eklof M; Griciene B; Holan K; Hyvonen H; Kerekes A; Lee MC; Moser M; Pernicka F; Cardis E
Radiat Res; 2007 Apr; 167(4):380-95. PubMed ID: 17388692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement error and model specification in determining how duration of tasks affects level of occupational exposure.
Burstyn I
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Apr; 53(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 19188265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Monte Carlo maximum likelihood method for estimating uncertainty arising from shared errors in exposures in epidemiological studies of nuclear workers.
Stayner L; Vrijheid M; Cardis E; Stram DO; Deltour I; Gilbert SJ; Howe G
Radiat Res; 2007 Dec; 168(6):757-63. PubMed ID: 18088178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of censoring on cancer risk estimates based on the Canadian National Dose Registry of occupational radiation exposure.
Shin H; Ramsay T; Krewski D; Zielinski JM
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 15(5):398-406. PubMed ID: 15592443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating historical radiation doses to a cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists.
Simon SL; Weinstock RM; Doody MM; Neton J; Wenzl T; Stewart P; Mohan AK; Yoder RC; Hauptmann M; Freedman DM; Cardarelli J; Feng HA; Bouville A; Linet M
Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):174-92. PubMed ID: 16808606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metamodels of bias in Cox proportional-hazards and logistic regressions with heteroscedastic measurement error under group-level exposure assessment.
Burstyn I; Kim HM; Cherry N; Yasui Y
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Apr; 50(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 16371413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adjusting for measurement error in the Cox proportional hazards regression model.
Mallick R; Fung K; Krewski D
J Cancer Epidemiol Prev; 2002; 7(4):155-64. PubMed ID: 12846486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recording of external radiation exposures at Oak Ridge National Laboratory: implications for epidemiological studies.
Wing S; West CM; Wood JL; Tankersley W
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1994; 4(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 7894270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method for estimating occupational radiation doses subject to minimum detection levels.
Xue X; Shore RE
Health Phys; 2003 Jan; 84(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 12498518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Varied forms of bias due to nondifferential error in measuring exposure.
Brenner H; Loomis D
Epidemiology; 1994 Sep; 5(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 7986865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of statistical methods for estimation of less than detectable ionising radiation exposures.
Daniels RD; Yiin JH
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(3):240-51. PubMed ID: 16517566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating the dose response relationship for occupational radiation exposure measured with minimum detection level.
Xue X; Shore RE; Ye X; Kim MY
Health Phys; 2004 Oct; 87(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 15359186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating measurement error in estimates of worker exposure assessed in parallel by personal and biological monitoring.
Symanski E; Greeson NM; Chan W
Am J Ind Med; 2007 Feb; 50(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 17238141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variance and confidence limits in validation studies based on comparison between three different types of measurements.
Ferrari P; Kaaks R; Riboli E
J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 11142606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low dose ionizing radiation exposure and cardiovascular disease mortality: cohort study based on Canadian national dose registry of radiation workers.
Zielinski JM; Ashmore PJ; Band PR; Jiang H; Shilnikova NS; Tait VK; Krewski D
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2009; 22(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 19329385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
