128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17099976)
1. Acute cholecystitis after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: a report 2 cases.
Shih JJ; Shih JY; Shi MY; Chen TH
Heart Surg Forum; 2006; 9(5):E800-2. PubMed ID: 17099976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB): two techniques for beating heart surgery.
Detter C; Reichenspurner H; Boehm DH; Thalhammer M; Raptis P; Schütz A; Reichart B
Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 12114131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Procalcitonin as a marker of systemic inflammation after conventional or minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.
Kilger E; Pichler B; Goetz AE; Rank N; Welte M; Mörstedt K; Vetter HO; Gödje O; Schmitz C; Lamm P; Engelschalk E; Muehlbeyer D; Frey L
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1998 Jun; 46(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 9714487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reducing cardiac surgical trauma: the minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass.
Fishman RL; Harvey SC; Zellner JL; Pinosky ML; Handy JR
South Med J; 1997 Oct; 90(10):965-71. PubMed ID: 9347805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Indication and patient selection in minimally invasive and òff-pump' coronary artery bypass grafting.
Diegeler A; Matin M; Falk V; Binner C; Walther T; Autschbach R; Mohr FW
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():S79-82. PubMed ID: 10536955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review.
Kettering K; Dapunt O; Baer FM
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2004 Jun; 45(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 15179338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: anesthetic, monitoring, and pain control considerations.
Heres EK; Marquez J; Malkowski MJ; Magovern JA; Gravlee GP
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1998 Aug; 12(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 9713723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome analysis of coronary artery bypass grafting: minimally invasive versus standard techniques.
Dickes MS; Stammers AH; Pierce ML; Alonso A; Fristoe L; Taft KJ; Beck DJ; Jones CC
Perfusion; 1999 Nov; 14(6):461-72. PubMed ID: 10585154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical factors influencing surgical approach selection of robotic-enhanced minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting].
Cheng N; Gao CQ; Yang M; Wu Y
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 51(11):1016-20. PubMed ID: 24444688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High thoracic epidural anesthesia for coronary artery bypass grafting using two different surgical approaches in conscious patients.
Kessler P; Neidhart G; Bremerich DH; Aybek T; Dogan S; Lischke V; Byhahn C
Anesth Analg; 2002 Oct; 95(4):791-7, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12351247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis.
Kettering K
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2008 Dec; 49(6):793-800. PubMed ID: 19043393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Less-invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: different techniques and approaches.
Diegeler A; Falk V; Krähling K; Matin M; Walther T; Autschbach R; Battelini R; Mohr FW
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Oct; 14 Suppl 1():S13-9. PubMed ID: 9814786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reoperative MIDCAB grafting: 3-year clinical experience.
Doty JR; Salazar JD; Fonger JD; Walinsky PL; Sussman MS; Salomon NW
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Jun; 13(6):641-9. PubMed ID: 9686794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Initial experience with beating heart surgery: comparison with fast-track methods.
Ott RA; Gutfinger DE; Steedman R; Tanner TM; Hlapcich WL
Am Surg; 1999 Nov; 65(11):1018-22. PubMed ID: 10551748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting: results from 402 patients and the usefulness of gastroepiploic artery composite grafting.
Takemura H; Watanabe G; Takahashi M; Tomita S; Higashidani K
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 May; 51(5):173-7. PubMed ID: 12776947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost and Outcome of Minimally Invasive Techniques for Coronary Surgery Using Robotic Technology.
Pasrija C; Kon ZN; Ghoreishi M; Lehr EJ; Gammie JS; Griffith BP; Bonatti J; Taylor BS
Innovations (Phila); 2018; 13(4):282-286. PubMed ID: 30130263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes after different non-sternotomy approaches to left single-vessel revascularization: a comparative study with up to 10-year follow-up.
Sabashnikov A; Patil NP; Weymann A; Mohite PN; Zych B; García Sáez D; Popov AF; Wahlers T; Wittwer T; Wippermann J; Amrani M; Trimlett R; Simon AR; Pepper J; Bahrami T
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Oct; 46(4):e48-55. PubMed ID: 25064052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atrial fibrillation after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.
Tamis-Holland JE; Homel P; Durani M; Iqbal M; Sutandar A; Mindich BP; Steinberg JS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 36(6):1884-8. PubMed ID: 11092660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB).
Watanabe Y; Koyama N
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Dec; 6(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 11173347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lateral MIDCAB grafting via limited posterior thoracotomy.
Fonger JD; Doty JR; Sussman MS; Salomon NW
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1997 Sep; 12(3):399-404; discussion 404-5. PubMed ID: 9332918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
