353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17099994)
1. Deja vu all over again: the false dichotomy between sanctity of life and quality of life.
Cantor NL
Stetson Law Rev; 2005; 35(1):81-100. PubMed ID: 17099994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Erring too far on the side of life: deja vu all over again in the Schiavo saga.
Allen W
Stetson Law Rev; 2005; 35(1):123-45. PubMed ID: 17099996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Chapter 765 revisited: Florida's new advance directives law.
Calder M
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 20(2):291-365. PubMed ID: 16001475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Exercising the right to die: a proposal for New York.
Caffera SM
Syracuse Law Rev; 1991; 42(4):1189-240. PubMed ID: 16130264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The health care agent: protecting the choices and interests of patients who lack capacity.
Swidler RN
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1988; 6(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 16998980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An Oklahoma perspective: end of life decision-making and termination of treatment.
Burkett TM; Weyrauch S
Tulsa Law J; 2000; 35(3-4):565-81. PubMed ID: 16273679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Advance directives: an overview of changing right-to-die laws.
Fade AE
J Nurs Law; 1995; 2(3):27-38. PubMed ID: 12545976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A time to live, a time to die.
Stiefel LS
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):699-741. PubMed ID: 16144097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients.
Dippel DL
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Looking beyond the law to improve end-of-life care.
Zuckerman C
Generations; 1999; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17144036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A survey of living will and advanced health care directives.
Horttor BJ
N D Law Rev; 1998; 74(2):233-93. PubMed ID: 16437813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Death and the court.
Capron AM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(5):25-9. PubMed ID: 9383664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence.
Roach CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment.
Ouellette AR
Indiana Law J; 2004; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nancy Cruzan and the best interest standard.
Veatch RM
Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):17-9. PubMed ID: 16038072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Advance directives in a correctional setting.
Thomas DL; Watson JM
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):878-99. PubMed ID: 12455557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The precarious role of the courts: surrogate health care decisionmaking.
Fader JF
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1193-219. PubMed ID: 12599351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical surrogacy mediation: expanding patient, family, and physician rights and reformulating the Virginia Health Care Decisions Act.
Moore DJ
Va J Soc Policy Law; 2003; 10(3):410-44. PubMed ID: 15744904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Advance care planning.
Gillick MR
N Engl J Med; 2004 Jan; 350(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 14702421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The ultimate test of autonomy: should minors have a right to make decisions regarding life-sustaining treatment?
Rosato JL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1996; 49(1):1-103. PubMed ID: 11865878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
