142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1710058)
1. Automatic reduction of stimulus polarization artifact for accurate evaluation of ventricular evoked responses.
Curtis AB; Vance F; Miller K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Apr; 14(4 Pt 1):529-37. PubMed ID: 1710058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new algorithm for minimizing pacemaker polarization artifact: universally applicable in permanent pacing systems.
Curtis AB; Vance F; Quist SM; Domijan A; Keim SG; Duran A; Miller K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 2):1803-8. PubMed ID: 1721179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method for analysis of the local atrial evoked response for determination of atrial capture in permanent pacing systems.
Curtis AB; Maas SM; Domijan A; Keim SG; Duran A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 1):1576-81. PubMed ID: 1721145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low polarization pacing lead for detecting the ventricular-evoked response.
Bolz A; Hubmann M; Hardt R; Riedmüller J; Schaldach M
Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(3):129-37. PubMed ID: 8127278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new pacemaker algorithm for continuous capture verification and automatic threshold determination: elimination of pacemaker afterpotential utilizing a triphasic charge balancing system.
Feld GK; Love CJ; Camerlo J; Marsella R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Feb; 15(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 1372416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristic variation in evoked potential amplitude with changes in pacing stimulus strength.
Curtis AB; Vance F; Miller-Shifrin K
Am J Cardiol; 1990 Aug; 66(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 2386117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved differentiation of the ventricular evoked response from polarization by modification of the pacemaker impulse.
Provenier F; Germonpré E; De Wagter X
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Dec; 23(12):2073-7. PubMed ID: 11202250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Autocapture enhancements: unipolar and bipolar lead compatibility and bipolar pacing capability on bipolar leads.
Binner L; Messenger J; Sperzel J; Bondke H; Vandekerckhove Y; Poore J; Scheiner J; Berkhof M; Park E; Holmström N; Bornzin GA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 26(1P2):221-4. PubMed ID: 12687816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new single catheter technique for simultaneous measurement of action potential duration and refractory period in vivo.
Franz MR; Chin MC; Sharkey HR; Griffin JC; Scheinman MM
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1990 Oct; 16(4):878-86. PubMed ID: 2212368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of two different evoked response sensing methods for automatic capture detection in the left ventricle.
Goetze S; Sperzel J; Biffi M; Sathaye A; Brooke MJ; Doelger A; Schubert B; Butter C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jul; 30(7):865-73. PubMed ID: 17584268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adjustment of the evoked response sensitivity after hospital discharge in pacemaker patients with automatic ventricular threshold tracking activated.
Schuchert A; Ventura R; Meinertz T;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Feb; 24(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 11270702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction of pacing output coupling capacitance for sensing the evoked response.
Sperzel J; Neuzner J; Schwarz T; Zhu Q; König A; Kay GN
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Sep; 24(9 Pt 1):1377-82. PubMed ID: 11584460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance evaluation of a right atrial automatic capture verification algorithm using two different sensing configurations.
Sperzel J; Goetze S; Kennergren C; Biffi M; Brooke MJ; Vireca E; Saha S; Schubert B; Butter C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 May; 32(5):579-87. PubMed ID: 19422578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acute effects of a class IA antiarrhythmic drug on the ventricular evoked response amplitude in patients with cardiac pacemakers.
Schuchert A; Meinertz T
Cardiology; 2000; 94(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 11173781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing threshold tracking: a North American multicenter study. Clinical Investigators of the Microny-Regency Clinical Evaluation Study.
Lau C; Cameron DA; Nishimura SC; Ahern T; Freedman RA; Ellenbogen K; Greenberg S; Baker J; Meacham D
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Jun; 23(6):953-9. PubMed ID: 10879378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous bipolar pacing and sensing during EPs.
Snoeck J; Berkhof M; Vrints C
J Electrocardiol; 1989; 22 Suppl():224-9. PubMed ID: 2614303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing automatic threshold tracking for continuous capture verification: a single-center prospective study.
Verma PK; Sharma JK; Khan IA; Bali HK; Varma JS; Bhargava M; Sharma YP; Grover A
Indian Heart J; 2001; 53(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 11759937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical experience with an automatic threshold tracking algorithm study.
Kennergren C; Larsson B; Uhrenius A; Gadler F;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Dec; 26(12):2219-24. PubMed ID: 14675003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Orthogonal ventricular electrogram sensing.
Goldreyer BN; Brueske R; Knudson MB; Cannom DS; Wyman MG
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Jul; 6(4):761-8. PubMed ID: 6192411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of the evoked response in determining the paced ventricular rate and performance of the QT or rate responsive (TX) pacemaker.
Fananapazir L; Rademaker M; Bennett DH
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1985 Sep; 8(5):701-14. PubMed ID: 2414752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
