536 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17100684)
1. Precision of QT interval measurement by advanced electrocardiographic equipment.
Hnatkova K; Gang Y; Batchvarov VN; Malik M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Nov; 29(11):1277-84. PubMed ID: 17100684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An algorithm for QT interval monitoring in neonatal intensive care units.
Helfenbein ED; Ackerman MJ; Rautaharju PM; Zhou SH; Gregg RE; Lindauer JM; Miller D; Wang JJ; Kresge SS; Babaeizadeh S; Feild DQ; Michaud FP
J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(6 Suppl):S103-10. PubMed ID: 17993306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of QT-measurement accuracy using the 12-lead electrocardiogram derived from EASI leads.
Martínez JP; Laguna P; Olmos S; Pahlm O; Pettersson J; Sörnmo L
J Electrocardiol; 2007 Apr; 40(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 17027840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implications of methodological differences in digital electrocardiogram interval measurement.
Badilini F; Sarapa N
J Electrocardiol; 2006 Oct; 39(4 Suppl):S152-6. PubMed ID: 16920141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic comparisons of electrocardiographic morphology increase the precision of QT interval measurement.
Hnatkova K; Smetana P; Toman O; Bauer A; Schmidt G; Malik M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 19140922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample size, power calculations, and their implications for the cost of thorough studies of drug induced QT interval prolongation.
Malik M; Hnatkova K; Batchvarov V; Gang Y; Smetana P; Camm AJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Dec; 27(12):1659-69. PubMed ID: 15613131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An algorithm for continuous real-time QT interval monitoring.
Helfenbein ED; Zhou SH; Lindauer JM; Field DQ; Gregg RE; Wang JJ; Kresge SS; Michaud FP
J Electrocardiol; 2006 Oct; 39(4 Suppl):S123-7. PubMed ID: 16920145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two automatic QT algorithms compared with manual measurement in identification of long QT syndrome.
Diamant UB; Winbo A; Stattin EL; Rydberg A; Kesek M; Jensen SM
J Electrocardiol; 2010; 43(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 20005993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of popular automatic QT interval algorithms assessed by a 'gold standard' and comparison with a Novel method: computer simulation study.
Hunt AC
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2005 Sep; 5():29. PubMed ID: 16185361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prolonged QT interval diagnosis suppression by a widely used computerized ECG analysis system.
Garg A; Lehmann MH
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2013 Feb; 6(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 23275261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Man versus machine: is there an optimal method for QT measurements in thorough QT studies?
Darpo B; Agin M; Kazierad DJ; Layton G; Muirhead G; Gray P; Jorkasky DK
J Clin Pharmacol; 2006 Jun; 46(6):598-612. PubMed ID: 16707406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of 2 methods of measuring the QT interval.
Rimmer LK; Rimmer JD
Am J Crit Care; 1998 Sep; 7(5):346-54. PubMed ID: 9740884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of QTinno, a fully automated electrocardiographic analysis program, to semiautomated electrocardiographic analysis methods in a drug safety study in healthy subjects.
Sarapa N; Gussak I; Vajdic B; George S; Hadzievski L; Francom SF; Kowey P
J Electrocardiol; 2009; 42(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 19362316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences between study-specific and subject-specific heart rate corrections of the QT interval in investigations of drug induced QTc prolongation.
Malik M; Hnatkova K; Batchvarov V
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jun; 27(6 Pt 1):791-800. PubMed ID: 15189536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the precision of QT measurements.
Darpo B; Fossa AA; Couderc JP; Zhou M; Schreyer A; Ticktin M; Zapesochny A
Cardiol J; 2011; 18(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 21769821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 5 methods of QT interval measurements on electrocardiograms from a thorough QT/QTc study: effect on assay sensitivity and categorical outliers.
Salvi V; Karnad DR; Panicker GK; Natekar M; Hingorani P; Kerkar V; Ramasamy A; de Vries M; Zumbrunnen T; Kothari S; Narula D
J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(2):96-104. PubMed ID: 21238976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subject-specific heart rate dependency of electrocardiographic QT, PQ, and QRS intervals.
Malik M; Hnatkova K; Sisakova M; Schmidt G
J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):491-7. PubMed ID: 18817925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigating the effect of sotalol on the repolarization intervals in healthy young individuals.
Couderc JP; Zhou M; Sarapa N; Zareba W
J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 18801493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of an algorithm for highly automated measurements of QT interval.
Brockway M; Hamlin R
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2011; 64(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 21640193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relation of QT interval measurements to evolving automated algorithms from different manufacturers of electrocardiographs.
Kligfield P; Hancock EW; Helfenbein ED; Dawson EJ; Cook MA; Lindauer JM; Zhou SH; Xue J
Am J Cardiol; 2006 Jul; 98(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 16784927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
