BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17101141)

  • 21. Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis in younger age patients could lead to higher stresses in the remaining neural arch -- a finite element investigation.
    Ivanov A; Faizan A; Sairyo K; Ebraheim N; Biyani A; Goel VK
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2007 Feb; 50(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17546538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Instant and fatigue stability analysis of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with stand-alone cage].
    Miao J; Xia Q; Zhang JD; Tan SJ; Qin XL; Feng QJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 88(7):457-60. PubMed ID: 18642785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hybrid testing of lumbar CHARITE discs versus fusions.
    Panjabi M; Malcolmson G; Teng E; Tominaga Y; Henderson G; Serhan H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):959-66; discussion 967. PubMed ID: 17450069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intradiscal pressure, shear strain, and fiber strain in the intervertebral disc under combined loading.
    Schmidt H; Kettler A; Heuer F; Simon U; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):748-55. PubMed ID: 17414908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How does posture affect coupling in the lumbar spine?
    Panjabi M; Yamamoto I; Oxland T; Crisco J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1989 Sep; 14(9):1002-11. PubMed ID: 2781406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of pressure effects on adjacent disk levels after 2-level lumbar constructs: fusion, hybrid, and total disk replacement.
    Nunley PD; Jawahar A; Mukherjee DP; Ogden A; Khan Z; Kerr EJ; Cavanaugh DA
    Surg Neurol; 2008 Sep; 70(3):247-51; discussion 251. PubMed ID: 18617238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multidirectional testing of one- and two-level ProDisc-L versus simulated fusions.
    Panjabi M; Henderson G; Abjornson C; Yue J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(12):1311-9. PubMed ID: 17515820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
    Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs.
    Hongo M; Gay RE; Zhao KD; Ilharreborde B; Huddleston PM; Berglund LJ; An KN; Zhao C
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):846-53. PubMed ID: 19660990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
    Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Finite element analysis of moment-rotation relationships for human cervical spine.
    Zhang QH; Teo EC; Ng HW; Lee VS
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(1):189-93. PubMed ID: 16271604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
    Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development and validation of osteoligamentous lumbar spine under complex loading conditions: A step towards patient-specific modeling.
    Umale S; Yoganandan N; Kurpad SN
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103898. PubMed ID: 32957203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease on the behavior of the adjacent segments--a finite element model study.
    Ruberté LM; Natarajan RN; Andersson GB
    J Biomech; 2009 Feb; 42(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 19136113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Phase lag of the intersegmental motion in flexion-extension of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. An in vivo study.
    Kanayama M; Abumi K; Kaneda K; Tadano S; Ukai T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jun; 21(12):1416-22. PubMed ID: 8792517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validation of a clinical finite element model of the human lumbosacral spine.
    Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Zhang J; Pintar FA; Cusick JF; Wolfla CE; Maiman DJ
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 Aug; 44(8):633-41. PubMed ID: 16937205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interaction between finite helical axes and facet joint forces under combined loading.
    Schmidt H; Heuer F; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(25):2741-8. PubMed ID: 19050579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-dimensional load-displacement curves due to forces on the cervical spine.
    Panjabi MM; Summers DJ; Pelker RR; Videman T; Friedlaender GE; Southwick WO
    J Orthop Res; 1986; 4(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 3712124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Validity and reliability of Spinal Mouse to assess lumbar flexion].
    Guermazi M; Ghroubi S; Kassis M; Jaziri O; Keskes H; Kessomtini W; Ben Hammouda I; Elleuch MH
    Ann Readapt Med Phys; 2006 May; 49(4):172-7. PubMed ID: 16630669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of compressive follower preload on the flexion-extension response of the human lumbar spine.
    Patwardhan AG; Havey RM; Carandang G; Simonds J; Voronov LI; Ghanayem AJ; Meade KP; Gavin TM; Paxinos O
    J Orthop Res; 2003 May; 21(3):540-6. PubMed ID: 12706029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.