156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17102422)
1. Nurses' perceptions of feed-back from the electronic patient record for the quality on pressure ulcer care.
Gunningberg L; Fogelberg-Dahm M; Ehrenberg A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():850. PubMed ID: 17102422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved quality and comprehensiveness in nursing documentation of pressure ulcers after implementing an electronic health record in hospital care.
Gunningberg L; Fogelberg-Dahm M; Ehrenberg A
J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1557-64. PubMed ID: 19220607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy in the recording of pressure ulcers and prevention after implementing an electronic health record in hospital care.
Gunningberg L; Dahm MF; Ehrenberg A
Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Aug; 17(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 18678726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nurses' experiences of and opinions about using standardised care plans in electronic health records--a questionnaire study.
Dahm MF; Wadensten B
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2137-45. PubMed ID: 18705735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A computerised guideline for pressure ulcer prevention.
Quaglini S; Grandi M; Baiardi P; Mazzoleni MC; Fassino C; Franchi G; Melino S
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():940-3. PubMed ID: 10725037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advancing nursing documentation--an intervention study using patients with leg ulcer as an example.
Törnvall E; Wahren LK; Wilhelmsson S
Int J Med Inform; 2009 Sep; 78(9):605-17. PubMed ID: 19447071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nurses' perceptions of the impact of electronic health records on work and patient outcomes.
Kossman SP; Scheidenhelm SL
Comput Inform Nurs; 2008; 26(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 18317257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nurses' documentation about pressure ulcers.
Pieper B; Mikols C; Mance B; Adams W
Decubitus; 1990 Feb; 3(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 2322410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors of importance to the development of pressure ulcers in the care trajectory: perceptions of hospital and community care nurses.
Athlin E; Idvall E; Jernfält M; Johansson I
J Clin Nurs; 2010 Aug; 19(15-16):2252-8. PubMed ID: 19886875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The experience of home nurses with an electronic nursing health record.
De Vliegher K; Paquay L; Vernieuwe S; Van Gansbeke H
Int Nurs Rev; 2010 Dec; 57(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 21050204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nurses' perceptions of and attitudes toward an electronic medical record system at Seoul National University Hospital.
Ahn TS; Park IS; You OS; Shin HJ; Woo KS; Jo EM
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():851. PubMed ID: 17102423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of wireless personal digital assistants for practice: perceptions of advanced practice nurses.
Garrett B; Klein G
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2146-54. PubMed ID: 18705736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptions of impact of electronic health records on nurses' work.
Kossman SP
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():337-41. PubMed ID: 17102276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nurses' evaluations of a novel design for an electronic medication administration record.
Staggers N; Kobus D; Brown C
Comput Inform Nurs; 2007; 25(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 17356327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [How to evaluate nursing procedures for bedsores, or decubitus ulcers by means of a codified and computerized record-keeping system].
González Jiménez F; Pareja Illeras M; Jiménez López P; Carmona Sánchez M
Rev Enferm; 2005 Jan; 28(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 15768955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing an electronic nursing record system for clinical care and nursing effectiveness research in a korean home healthcare setting.
Lee EJ; Lee M; Moorhead S
Comput Inform Nurs; 2009; 27(4):234-44. PubMed ID: 19574749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nurses' knowledge of prevention and management of pressure ulcer at a health insurance hospital in Alexandria.
El Enein NY; Zaghloul AA
Int J Nurs Pract; 2011 Jun; 17(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 21605266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health status measurement in computer-based patient record systems.
Henry SB; Lush M; Costantino M; Sousa K; Mead CN; Holzemer WL
Nurs Adm Q; 1997; 21(3):50-60. PubMed ID: 9215005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors influencing the quality of medical documentation when a paper-based medical records system is replaced with an electronic medical records system: an Iranian case study.
Pourasghar F; Malekafzali H; Koch S; Fors U
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 18828939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of nurse attitudes before implementation and 6 and 18 months after implementation of an electronic health record.
Laramee AS; Bosek M; Shaner-McRae H; Powers-Phaneuf T
Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Oct; 30(10):521-30. PubMed ID: 22584880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]