BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17105644)

  • 1. Linking obstetric and midwifery practice with optimal outcomes.
    Cragin L; Kennedy HP
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2006; 35(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 17105644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical evaluation of evidence-based maternity care using the Optimality Index.
    Low LK; Miller J
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2006; 35(6):786-93. PubMed ID: 17105645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. San Francisco General Hospital nurse-midwifery practice: the first thousand births.
    Mann RJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jul; 140(6):676-82. PubMed ID: 7258241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.
    Benjamin Y; Walsh D; Taub N
    Midwifery; 2001 Sep; 17(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 11502143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Optimality Index-US (OI-US) to assess maternity care outcomes.
    Yucel C; Taskin L; Low LK
    Midwifery; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1135-42. PubMed ID: 26299370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using the Optimality Index-US to Teach Midwifery Students to Recognize and Implement Evidence-Based Practices That Promote Optimal Outcomes in Perinatal Health.
    van Olphen Fehr J
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2013; 58(5):531-7; quiz 537. PubMed ID: 23927390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of the Optimality Index as a new approach to evaluating outcomes of maternity care.
    Murphy PA; Fullerton JT
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2006; 35(6):770-8. PubMed ID: 17105643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring the best outcome for the least intervention: can the Optimality Index-US be applied in the UK?
    Sheridan M; Sandall J
    Midwifery; 2010 Dec; 26(6):e9-15. PubMed ID: 20005027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Down the rabbit hole: examining outcomes of nurse midwifery care.
    Vincent D; Hastings-Tolsma M; Park JH
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2004; 19(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 15535542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A concept analysis of optimality in perinatal health.
    Kennedy HP
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2006; 35(6):763-9. PubMed ID: 17105642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Creating an Optimality Index - Netherlands: a validation study.
    Thompson SM; Nieuwenhuijze MJ; Budé L; de Vries R; Kane Low L
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Apr; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 29661167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of the Optimality Index-United States in perinatal clinical research: a validation study.
    Low LK; Seng JS; Miller JM
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2008; 53(4):302-9. PubMed ID: 18586182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The landscape of caring for women: a narrative study of midwifery practice.
    Kennedy HP; Shannon MT; Chuahorm U; Kravetz MK
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2004; 49(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 14710136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of midwifery care to medical care in hospitals in the Quebec pilot projects study: clinical indicators. L'Equipe dEvaluation des Projets-Pilotes Sages-Femmes.
    Fraser W; Hatem-Asmar M; Krauss I; Maillard F; Bréart G; Blais R
    Can J Public Health; 2000; 91(1):I5-11. PubMed ID: 10765581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Women's Health Care Minimum Data Set: pilot test and validation for use in clinical practice.
    Farley CL; Tharpe N; Miller L; Ruxer DJ
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2006; 51(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 17081941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Midwifery care in rural and remote British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes of rural parturient women with a midwife involved in their care, 2003 to 2008.
    Stoll K; Kornelsen J
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 24588878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring the quality of documented care given by Swedish midwives during birth.
    Kvist LJ; Damiati N; Rosenqvist J; Sandin-Bojö AK
    Midwifery; 2011 Dec; 27(6):e188-94. PubMed ID: 20833458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of the birthplace and models of care on midwifery practice for the management of women in labour.
    Freeman LM; Adair V; Timperley H; West SH
    Women Birth; 2006 Dec; 19(4):97-105. PubMed ID: 17070742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antenatal, delivery and postnatal comparisons of maternal satisfaction with two pilot Changing Childbirth schemes compared with a traditional model of care.
    Spurgeon P; Hicks C; Barwell F
    Midwifery; 2001 Jun; 17(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 11399133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the implementation of the model of integrated and humanised midwifery health services in Santiago, Chile.
    Binfa L; Pantoja L; Ortiz J; Gurovich M; Cavada G
    Midwifery; 2013 Oct; 29(10):1151-7. PubMed ID: 23932035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.