These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17105644)

  • 21. Capacity building of skilled birth attendants: a review of pre-service education curricula.
    Adegoke AA; Mani S; Abubakar A; van den Broek N
    Midwifery; 2013 Jul; 29(7):e64-72. PubMed ID: 23199532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.
    Kataoka Y; Eto H; Iida M
    Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):965-72. PubMed ID: 23415360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A model for the future. Certified nurse-midwives replace residents and house staff in hospitals.
    Ament LA; Hanson L
    Nurs Health Care Perspect; 1998; 19(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 10446546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measuring outcomes of midwifery care: development of an instrument to assess optimality.
    Murphy PA; Fullerton JT
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2001; 46(5):274-84. PubMed ID: 11725898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Midwife crisis?
    Beech BL; Robinson J
    Health Serv J; 1992 Jan; 102(5285):18-9. PubMed ID: 10116991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Partnership in midwifery care in New Zealand.
    Freeman LM; Timperley H; Adair V
    Midwifery; 2004 Mar; 20(1):2-14. PubMed ID: 15020023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cost-effectiveness of midwifery services vs. medical services in Quebec. LEquipe dEvaluation des Projets-Pilotes Sages-Femmes.
    Reinharz D; Blais R; Fraser WD; Contandriopoulos AP
    Can J Public Health; 2000; 91(1):I12-5. PubMed ID: 10765582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Variation in intrapartum referral rates in primary midwifery care in the Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment.
    Offerhaus PM; Otten W; Boxem-Tiemessen JC; de Jonge A; van der Pal-de Bruin KM; Scheepers PL; Lagro-Janssen AL
    Midwifery; 2015 Apr; 31(4):e69-78. PubMed ID: 25660846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The theoretical basis for nurse-midwifery practice in the United States: a critical analysis of three theories.
    Cragin L
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2004; 49(5):381-9. PubMed ID: 15351327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Exploration of preterm birth rates associated with different models of antenatal midwifery care in Scotland: Unmatched retrospective cohort analysis.
    Symon A; Winter C; Cochrane L
    Midwifery; 2015 Jun; 31(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 25819706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Yolo County Midwifery Service. A descriptive study of 496 singleton birth outcomes, 1990.
    Schimmel LM; Hogan P; Boehler B; DiFelice M; Cooney A; Schimmel LD
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1992; 37(6):398-403. PubMed ID: 1460529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of a certified nurse-midwifery database for use in quality monitoring and outcomes research.
    DeJoy S; Pekow P; Bertone-Johnson E; Chasan-Taber L
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(4):438-46. PubMed ID: 24890854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Quality assurance in midwifery outside the hospital: reasoning and suggestions for its execution].
    Dangel-Vogelsang B; Korporal J
    Pflege; 1998 Dec; 11(6):342-9. PubMed ID: 10427279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A non-randomised trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of Midwifery Group Practice compared with standard maternity care arrangements in one Australian hospital.
    Toohill J; Turkstra E; Gamble J; Scuffham PA
    Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e874-9. PubMed ID: 22172743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retrospective Review of Nurse-Midwifery Care at a Large University Health System.
    Roosevelt L; Motino Bailey J; Kane Low L
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2015; 29(4):296-304. PubMed ID: 26505846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The utilization of a Midwifery Obstetrical Unit (MOU) in a Metropolitan area.
    Mashazi MI; Roos SD
    Curationis; 2000 Dec; 23(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 11949299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.
    Hood L; Fenwick J; Butt J
    Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):268-85. PubMed ID: 18804902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The impact of obesity on outcomes of midwife-led pregnancy and childbirth in a primary care population: a prospective cohort study.
    Daemers DO; Wijnen HA; van Limbeek EB; Budé LM; Nieuwenhuijze MJ; Spaanderman ME; de Vries RG
    BJOG; 2014 Oct; 121(11):1403-13. PubMed ID: 24618305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exercise of essential competencies for midwifery care by nurses in São Paulo, Brazil.
    Narchi NZ
    Midwifery; 2011 Feb; 27(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 19892446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reforming maternity services in Australia: Outcomes of a private practice midwifery service.
    Wilkes E; Gamble J; Adam G; Creedy DK
    Midwifery; 2015 Oct; 31(10):935-40. PubMed ID: 26092305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.