BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17106401)

  • 1. Comparison of aberrometer and autorefractor measures of refractive error in children.
    Martinez AA; Pandian A; Sankaridurg P; Rose K; Huynh SC; Mitchell P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):811-7. PubMed ID: 17106401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia.
    Salmon TO; van de Pol C
    Optometry; 2005 Aug; 76(8):461-72. PubMed ID: 16150413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of aberrometry-based relative peripheral refraction measurements.
    Berntsen DA; Mutti DO; Zadnik K
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 18201339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PowerRefractor versus Canon R-50 Autorefraction to assess refractive error in children: a community-based study in ecuador.
    Virgili G; Angi M; Heede S; Rodriguez D; Bottega E; Molinari A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Feb; 84(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 17299345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of refractive error: comparison of autorefractor and focometer.
    du Toit R; Soong K; Brian G; Ramke J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):582-8. PubMed ID: 16909083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of refractive error measures by the IRX3 aberrometer and autorefraction.
    McCullough SJ; Little JA; Breslin KM; Saunders KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1183-90. PubMed ID: 25192432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of refractive errors in young myopes using the COAS Shack-Hartmann aberrometer.
    Salmon TO; West RW; Gasser W; Kenmore T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jan; 80(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 12553539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
    Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of accuracy of refraction measurement in children up to the age of 15 years using the PowerRef II and by standard techniques].
    Osmera J; Korynta J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2005 May; 61(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 15981493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Plusoptix Vision Screener: the accuracy and repeatability of refractive measurements using a new autorefractor.
    Dahlmann-Noor AH; Comyn O; Kostakis V; Misra A; Gupta N; Heath J; Brown J; Iron A; McGill S; Vrotsou K; Vivian AJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 93(3):346-9. PubMed ID: 19001013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noncycloplegic photorefractive screening in pre-school children with the "PowerRefractor" in a pediatric practice.
    Schaeffel F; Mathis U; Brüggemann G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):630-9. PubMed ID: 17632312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tonic accommodation, age, and refractive error in children.
    Zadnik K; Mutti DO; Kim HS; Jones LA; Qiu PH; Moeschberger ML
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 May; 40(6):1050-60. PubMed ID: 10235538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of confidence number on the screening accuracy of the retinomax autorefractor.
    VISION IN PRESCHOOLERS STUDY GROUP
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 84(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 17435531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of an open view autorefractor with an open view aberrometer in determining peripheral refraction in children.
    Demir P; Macedo AF; Chakraborty R; Baskaran K
    J Optom; 2023; 16(1):20-29. PubMed ID: 35022155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of refractive error measurements in adults with Z-View aberrometer, Humphrey autorefractor, and subjective refraction.
    Cooper J; Citek K; Feldman JM
    Optometry; 2011 Apr; 82(4):231-40. PubMed ID: 21439490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethnic differences in refraction and ocular biometry in a population-based sample of 11-15-year-old Australian children.
    Ip JM; Huynh SC; Robaei D; Kifley A; Rose KA; Morgan IG; Wang JJ; Mitchell P
    Eye (Lond); 2008 May; 22(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 17277756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of the Hand-held Wavefront Aberrometer in Measurement of Refractive Error.
    Han JY; Yoon S; Brown NS; Han SH; Han J
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):227-234. PubMed ID: 32495531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in children.
    Chat SW; Edwards MH
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Mar; 21(2):87-100. PubMed ID: 11261351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.