476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17107539)
21. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals.
Azar MR; Mokhtare M
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):363. PubMed ID: 21891918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of a brushing working motion on the fatigue life of NiTi rotary instruments.
Plotino G; Grande NM; Sorci E; Malagnino VA; Somma F
Int Endod J; 2007 Jan; 40(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 17209832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1.
Thompson SA; Dummer PM
J Endod; 1997 Nov; 23(11):698-702. PubMed ID: 9587312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Shaping ability of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals.
Madureira RG; Forner Navarro L; Llena MC; Costa M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Feb; 109(2):e136-44. PubMed ID: 19969482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of size and taper of artificial canals on the trajectory of NiTi rotary instruments in cyclic fatigue studies.
Plotino G; Grande NM; Mazza C; Petrovic R; Testarelli L; Gambarini G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):e60-6. PubMed ID: 19926504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
Bonaccorso A; Cantatore G; Condorelli GG; Schäfer E; Tripi TR
J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 19482191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals.
Kim HC; Kim HJ; Lee CJ; Kim BM; Park JK; Versluis A
Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):593-602. PubMed ID: 19467053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
Yun HH; Kim SK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
Gergi R; Sabbagh C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
Schirrmeister JF; Strohl C; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 16731405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of cyclic fatigue between used and new Mtwo Ni-Ti rotary instruments.
Plotino G; Grande NM; Sorci E; Malagnino VA; Somma F
Int Endod J; 2006 Sep; 39(9):716-23. PubMed ID: 16916361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals.
Calberson FL; Deroose CA; Hommez GM; De Moor RJ
Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):613-23. PubMed ID: 15317565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.
Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the shaping ability of RaCe and FlexMaster rotary nickel-titanium systems in simulated canals.
Merrett SJ; Bryant ST; Dummer PM
J Endod; 2006 Oct; 32(10):960-2. PubMed ID: 16982273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cyclic fatigue resistance and three-dimensional analysis of instruments from two nickel-titanium rotary systems.
Grande NM; Plotino G; Pecci R; Bedini R; Malagnino VA; Somma F
Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):755-63. PubMed ID: 16948660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Cleanliness of the root canal walls after preparation with Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments: a SEM study].
Lichota D; Nowicka A; Woźniak K; Lipski M
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(3):58-62. PubMed ID: 19839513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fracture of ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a laboratory simulation assessment.
Di Fiore PM; Genov KI; Komaroff E; Dasanayake AP; Lin L
Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):502-9. PubMed ID: 16674746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
