These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17107539)

  • 41. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study.
    Ward JR; Parashos P; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2003 Nov; 29(11):756-63. PubMed ID: 14651285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparison of torque required to fracture three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments around curves of the same angle but of different radius when bound at the tip.
    Booth JR; Scheetz JP; Lemons JE; Eleazer PD
    J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 12540222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
    Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
    Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison between a hand stainless-steel K file and a rotary NiTi 0.04 taper.
    Namazikhah MS; Mokhlis HR; Alasmakh K
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 28(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 11324127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 2.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2000 May; 33(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 11307444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Florek H
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 12657146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A comparison of the canal centering ability of ProFile, K3, and RaCe Nickel Titanium rotary systems.
    Al-Sudani D; Al-Shahrani S
    J Endod; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1198-201. PubMed ID: 17174683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Decrease in the fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use in curved root canals.
    Bahia MG; Buono VT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Aug; 100(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 16037784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Analysis of forces developed during mechanical preparation of extracted teeth using RaCe rotary instruments and ProFiles.
    da Silva FM; Kobayashi C; Suda H
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 15606818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of simulated clinical use on the torsional behavior of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
    Bahia MG; Melo MC; Buono VT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):675-80. PubMed ID: 16632283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Clinical evaluation of two types of NiTi rotary instruments in preparation of root canals].
    Hu XL; Ling JQ; Chen H; Gu HJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 40(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 15774145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [The effects of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments on root canal curvature].
    Wei X; Cheung SP
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2001 Dec; 10(4):333-5. PubMed ID: 14993966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cyclic fatigue of endodontic nickel titanium rotary instruments: static and dynamic tests.
    Li UM; Lee BS; Shih CT; Lan WH; Lin CP
    J Endod; 2002 Jun; 28(6):448-51. PubMed ID: 12067126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals.
    Park H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):715-8. PubMed ID: 11402288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. An in vitro comparison of canal preparation using two automated rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques.
    Jardine SJ; Gulabivala K
    Int Endod J; 2000 Jul; 33(4):381-91. PubMed ID: 11307215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals.
    Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Haznedaroğlu F; Tanalp J; Bayirli G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 16243253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals.
    Coleman CL; Svec TA
    J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 9594772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Shaping ability of Quantec Series 2000 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 2.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 1998 Jul; 31(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 9823116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use with low- and high-torque endodontic motors.
    Gambarini G
    J Endod; 2001 Dec; 27(12):772-4. PubMed ID: 11771588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.