These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17108645)

  • 1. Removal of paper-based health records from Norwegian hospitals: effects on clinical workflow.
    Lium JT; Faxvaag A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():1031-6. PubMed ID: 17108645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From the front line, report from a near paperless hospital: mixed reception among health care professionals.
    Lium JT; Laerum H; Schulz T; Faxvaag A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2006; 13(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 16929040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of and attitudes to a hospital information system by medical secretaries, nurses and physicians deprived of the paper-based medical record: a case report.
    Laerum H; Karlsen TH; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2004 Oct; 4():18. PubMed ID: 15488150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The fate of clinical department systems at the dawn of hospital-wide electronic health records in a Norwegian university hospital.
    Vedvik E; Faxvaag A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():298-303. PubMed ID: 17108540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.
    Lium JT; Tjora A; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18186935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Norwegians GPs' use of electronic patient record systems.
    Christensen T; Faxvaag A; Loerum H; Grimsmo A
    Int J Med Inform; 2009 Dec; 78(12):808-14. PubMed ID: 19828365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of scanning and eliminating paper-based medical records on hospital physicians' clinical work practice.
    Laerum H; Karlsen TH; Faxvaag A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2003; 10(6):588-95. PubMed ID: 12925550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing the quality of medical documentation when a paper-based medical records system is replaced with an electronic medical records system: an Iranian case study.
    Pourasghar F; Malekafzali H; Koch S; Fors U
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 18828939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: physicians suffer from poor usability.
    Viitanen J; Hyppönen H; Lääveri T; Vänskä J; Reponen J; Winblad I
    Int J Med Inform; 2011 Oct; 80(10):708-25. PubMed ID: 21784701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Information technology and medical record routines in hospitals in the health care region 2].
    Jacobsen GM; Stangeland N; Velund TL; Blørstad O
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Oct; 119(25):3765-8. PubMed ID: 10574055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electronic health records: which practices have them, and how are clinicians using them?
    Simon SR; McCarthy ML; Kaushal R; Jenter CA; Volk LA; Poon EG; Yee KC; Orav EJ; Williams DH; Bates DW
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Feb; 14(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18211642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is it possible for nurses and doctors to form a useful clinical overview of an EHR?
    Neve K; Kragh Iversen R; Andersen CK
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():314-9. PubMed ID: 17102271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electronic medical record systems in Israel's public hospitals.
    Lejbkowicz I; Denekamp Y; Reis S; Goldenberg D
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2004 Oct; 6(10):583-7. PubMed ID: 15473582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system.
    Likourezos A; Chalfin DB; Murphy DG; Sommer B; Darcy K; Davidson SJ
    J Emerg Med; 2004 Nov; 27(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 15498630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Positive effects of electronic patient records on three clinical activities.
    Hertzum M; Simonsen J
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Dec; 77(12):809-17. PubMed ID: 18457987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Market effects on electronic health record adoption by physicians.
    Abdolrasulnia M; Menachemi N; Shewchuk RM; Ginter PM; Duncan WJ; Brooks RG
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2008; 33(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 18580304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey.
    Simon SR; Kaushal R; Cleary PD; Jenter CA; Volk LA; Orav EJ; Burdick E; Poon EG; Bates DW
    Arch Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 167(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17353500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors influencing nurses' attitudes towards the use of computerized health information systems in Kuwaiti hospitals.
    Alquraini H; Alhashem AM; Shah MA; Chowdhury RI
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Feb; 57(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 17291201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Universal electronic health record MUDR.
    Hanzlicek P; Spidlen J; Nagy M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 105():190-201. PubMed ID: 15718608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nurses' views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with electronic medical records: questionnaire development.
    Otieno OG; Toyama H; Asonuma M; Kanai-Pak M; Naitoh K
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 17877568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.