These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17108749)

  • 61. Implementing an electronic medical record with computerized prescriber order entry at a critical access hospital.
    Horning R
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2011 Dec; 68(23):2288-92. PubMed ID: 22095820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The impact of hospitalwide computerized physician order entry on medical errors in a pediatric hospital.
    Upperman JS; Staley P; Friend K; Neches W; Kazimer D; Benes J; Wiener ES
    J Pediatr Surg; 2005 Jan; 40(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 15868559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The characteristics of personal order sets in a computerized physician order entry system at a community hospital.
    Thomas SM; Davis DC
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():1031. PubMed ID: 14728534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Record limbo. Hybrid systems add burden and risk to data reporting.
    Dimick C
    J AHIMA; 2008; 79(11):28-32. PubMed ID: 19115730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Explore all-encompassing electronic health records.
    Carr DM; Dimitrakakis J
    Nurs Manage; 2003 Oct; Suppl():24-5, 32. PubMed ID: 14574183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Medication Administration Time Study (MATS): nursing staff performance of medication administration.
    Elganzouri ES; Standish CA; Androwich I
    J Nurs Adm; 2009 May; 39(5):204-10. PubMed ID: 19423985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The electronic health record.
    McCartney P
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2004; 29(5):328. PubMed ID: 15329637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Prescription errors and the impact of computerized prescription order entry system in a community-based hospital.
    Jayawardena S; Eisdorfer J; Indulkar S; Pal SA; Sooriabalan D; Cucco R
    Am J Ther; 2007; 14(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 17667207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Latest Leapfrog survey finds hospitals lagging in quality goals.
    Traynor K
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 Jun; 66(11):972-3. PubMed ID: 19451602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Reducing medication errors and improving systems reliability using an electronic medication reconciliation system.
    Agrawal A; Wu WY
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2009 Feb; 35(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 19241731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Impact of a computerized physician order-entry system.
    Stone WM; Smith BE; Shaft JD; Nelson RD; Money SR
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 May; 208(5):960-7; discussion 967-9. PubMed ID: 19476871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Effect of bar-code-assisted medication administration on medication administration errors.
    Hassink JJ; Essenberg MD; Roukema JA; van den Bemt PM
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2013 Apr; 70(7):572-3. PubMed ID: 23515508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify.
    Denham CR; Classen DC; Swenson SJ; Henderson MJ; Zeltner T; Bates DW
    J Patient Saf; 2013 Dec; 9(4):177-89. PubMed ID: 24257062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. EMRs in the fourth stage: the future of electronic medical records based on the experience at Intermountain Health Care.
    Thompson DI; Classen DC; Haug PJ
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2007; 21(3):49-60. PubMed ID: 19195294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Computerized provider order entry and patient safety.
    Lehmann CU; Kim GR
    Pediatr Clin North Am; 2006 Dec; 53(6):1169-84. PubMed ID: 17126689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Acceptability and feasibility of the Leapfrog computerized physician order entry evaluation tool for hospitals outside the United States.
    Cho I; Lee JH; Choi SK; Choi JW; Hwang H; Bates DW
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Sep; 84(9):694-701. PubMed ID: 26049311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Implementing computerized provider order entry with an existing clinical information system.
    Barron WM; Reed RL; Forsythe S; Hecht D; Glen J; Murphy B; Lach R; Flores S; Tu J; Concklin M
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2006 Sep; 32(9):506-16. PubMed ID: 17987874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Computerized provider order entry: strategies for successful implementation.
    Jones S; Moss J
    J Nurs Adm; 2006 Mar; 36(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 16601516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The shift in workarounds upon implementation of computerized physician order entry.
    Van Der Sijs H; Rootjes I; Aarts J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():290-4. PubMed ID: 21893759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Empower nurses with evidence-based knowledge.
    Matter S
    Nurs Manage; 2006 Dec; 37(12):34-7. PubMed ID: 17159562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.