BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

514 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17109645)

  • 21. How to deal with multiple treatment or dose groups in randomized clinical trials?
    Hothorn LA
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):137-54. PubMed ID: 17391286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Design and analysis issues of multiregional clinical trials with different regional primary endpoints.
    Tsou HH; Tsong Y; Chang WJ; Dong X; Hsiao CF
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012 Sep; 22(5):1051-9. PubMed ID: 22946949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis strategies for adaptive designs with multiple endpoints.
    Chang M; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1189-200. PubMed ID: 18027225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A note on one-sided tests with multiple endpoints.
    Perlman MD; Wu L
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):276-9; discussion 279-80. PubMed ID: 15032799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two-stage designs for dose-finding trials with a biologic endpoint using stepwise tests.
    Polley MY; Cheung YK
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):232-41. PubMed ID: 17573866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Method of balanced adjustment in testing co-primary endpoints.
    Kordzakhia G; Siddiqui O; Huque MF
    Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(19):2055-66. PubMed ID: 20683896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bonferroni-based correction factor for multiple, correlated endpoints.
    Shi Q; Pavey ES; Carter RE
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(4):300-9. PubMed ID: 22588983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Statistical tests based on new composite hypotheses in clinical trials reflecting the relative clinical importance of multiple endpoints quantitatively.
    Nishikawa M; Tango T; Ohtaki M
    Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):749-62. PubMed ID: 19777463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Some issues with composite endpoints in clinical trials.
    Chi GY
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2005 Dec; 19(6):609-19. PubMed ID: 16313272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Challenge of multiple co-primary endpoints: a new approach.
    Chuang-Stein C; Stryszak P; Dmitrienko A; Offen W
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(6):1181-92. PubMed ID: 16927251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hierarchical testing of multiple endpoints in group-sequential trials.
    Glimm E; Maurer W; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 19827011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Superiority inferences on individual endpoints following noninferiority testing in clinical trials.
    Logan BR; Tamhane AC
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):693-703. PubMed ID: 18932132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Addressing multiplicity issues of a composite endpoint and its components in clinical trials.
    Huque MF; Alosh M; Bhore R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):610-34. PubMed ID: 21516560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the statistical power for multiple tests: a case study.
    Yeo A; Qu Y
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 18381588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Test and power considerations for multiple endpoint analyses using sequentially rejective graphical procedures.
    Bretz F; Maurer W; Hommel G
    Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1489-501. PubMed ID: 21290405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multiple comparisons in complex clinical trial designs.
    Hung HM; Wang SJ
    Biom J; 2013 May; 55(3):420-9. PubMed ID: 23620458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multiplicity adjustment for multiple endpoints in clinical trials with multiple doses of an active treatment.
    Quan H; Luo X; Capizzi T
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(14):2151-70. PubMed ID: 15909290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of futility in clinical trials.
    Snapinn S; Chen MG; Jiang Q; Koutsoukos T
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 17128426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multiple-arm superiority and non-inferiority designs with various endpoints.
    Chang M
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 17323311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What we want versus what we can get: a closer look at failure time endpoints for cardiovascular studies.
    Song R; Cook TD; Kosorok MR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(2):370-81. PubMed ID: 18327727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.