1296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17110255)
1. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition.
Croft RS; Buschang PH; English JD; Meyer R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 10511673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
Baysal A; Uysal T
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: A prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jun; 115(6):607-18. PubMed ID: 10358242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes in patients with a Class II relationship treated with clear aligner mandibular advancement and Herbst appliance followed by comprehensive orthodontic treatment.
Hosseini HR; Ngan P; Tai SK; Andrews LJ; Xiang J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Feb; 165(2):205-219. PubMed ID: 37831020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
Martin J; Pancherz H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate post-treatment crowned Herbst effects in growing patients.
Latkauskiene D; Jakobsone G
Stomatologija; 2012; 14(3):89-92. PubMed ID: 23128491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of two-phase treatment with the Herbst appliance and preadjusted edgewise therapy.
Lai M; McNamara JA
Semin Orthod; 1998 Mar; 4(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 9573874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition.
de Almeida MR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; Weber U; McNamara JA
Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):540-7. PubMed ID: 16097222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
Pancherz H
Am J Orthod; 1982 Aug; 82(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 6961781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of incremental vs maximum bite advancement during Herbst appliance therapy in late adolescent and young adult patients.
Amuk NG; Baysal A; Coskun R; Kurt G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jan; 155(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 30591165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation.
Windmiller EC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 8322726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Bishara SE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion.
Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Chermak DS; Kaczynski R; Simon ES; Haerian A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 12637901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanisms of Class II correction induced by the crown Herbst appliance as a single-phase Class II therapy: 1 year follow-up.
Jakobsone G; Latkauskiene D; McNamara JA
Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():27. PubMed ID: 24326090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
