241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17110263)
1. Assessing treatment outcomes for a graduate orthodontics program: follow-up study for the classes of 2001-2003.
Knierim K; Roberts WE; Hartsfield J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):648-55, 655.e1-3. PubMed ID: 17110263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment outcomes in a graduate orthodontic clinic for cases defined by the American Board of Orthodontics malocclusion categories.
Campbell CL; Roberts WE; Hartsfield JK; Qi R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):822-9. PubMed ID: 18068603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment complexity index for assessing the relationship of treatment duration and outcomes in a graduate orthodontics clinic.
Vu CQ; Roberts WE; Hartsfield JK; Ofner S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):9.e1-13. PubMed ID: 18174061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of prospectively and retrospectively selected American Board of Orthodontics cases.
Struble BH; Huang GJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):6.e1-8; discussion 6-8. PubMed ID: 20122416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
Djeu G; Shelton C; Maganzini A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):292-8; discussion 298. PubMed ID: 16168325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Need for training sessions for orthodontists in the use of the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
Murakami K; Deguchi T; Hashimoto T; Imai M; Miyawaki S; Takano-Yamamoto T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):427.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17920490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The excellence challenge in orthodontics: clinical use of an objective grading system for orthodontic cases.
Cordua T; Ursini R; Giuliante L; Deli R
Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):4-15. PubMed ID: 20545087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of university and private-practice orthodontic treatment outcomes with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
Cook DR; Harris EF; Vaden JL
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):707-12. PubMed ID: 15953896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment outcome in a graduate orthodontic clinic using the American Board of Orthodontics grading system.
Yang-Powers LC; Sadowsky C; Rosenstein S; BeGole EA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):451-5. PubMed ID: 12439471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.
Okunami TR; Kusnoto B; BeGole E; Evans CA; Sadowsky C; Fadavi S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 17208106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term posttreatment changes measured by the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
Nett BC; Huang GJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):444-50; quiz 516. PubMed ID: 15821689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The quality of treatment in the adult orthodontic patient as judged by orthodontists and measured by the Objective Grading System.
Chaison ET; Liu X; Tuncay OC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4 Suppl):S69-75. PubMed ID: 21435541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes: early treatment versus late treatment.
Hsieh TJ; Pinskaya Y; Roberts WE
Angle Orthod; 2005 Mar; 75(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 15825777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
Onyeaso CO; Begole EA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Feb; 131(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 17276867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comprehensive clinical evaluation as an outcome assessment for a graduate orthodontics program.
Pinskaya YB; Hsieh TJ; Roberts WE; Hartsfield JK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Nov; 126(5):533-43. PubMed ID: 15520685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A report of the ABO Resident Clinical Outcome Study (the pilot study).
Dykhouse VJ; Moffitt AH; Grubb JE; Greco PM; English JD; Briss BS; Jamieson SA; Kastrop MC; Owens SE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):656-61. PubMed ID: 17110264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new method of evaluating posterior occlusion and its relation to posttreatment occlusal changes.
Parkinson CE; Buschang PH; Behrents RG; Throckmorton GS; English JD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Nov; 120(5):503-12. PubMed ID: 11709669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in nonextraction, 2 maxillary premolar extraction, and 4 premolar extraction protocols with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
Akinci Cansunar H; Uysal T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):595-602. PubMed ID: 24785923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.
Costalos PA; Sarraf K; Cangialosi TJ; Efstratiadis S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 16286210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of the Objective Grading System of the American Board of Orthodontics to evaluate treatment at the Orthodontic Graduate Program Clinic, University of Puerto Rico, 2007-2008.
Santiago JJ; MartÃnez CJ
P R Health Sci J; 2012 Mar; 31(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 22432406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
