These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17110783)

  • 1. Pencil kernel correction and residual error estimation for quality-index-based dose calculations.
    Nyholm T; Olofsson J; Ahnesjö A; Georg D; Karlsson M
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6245-62. PubMed ID: 17110783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modelling lateral beam quality variations in pencil kernel based photon dose calculations.
    Nyholm T; Olofsson J; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(16):4111-8. PubMed ID: 16885628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correcting kernel tilting and hardening in convolution/superposition dose calculations for clinical divergent and polychromatic photon beams.
    Liu HH; Mackie TR; McCullough EC
    Med Phys; 1997 Nov; 24(11):1729-41. PubMed ID: 9394280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of divergence and nonuniformity on the x-ray pencil-beam dose kernel.
    Ceberg CP; Bjärngard BE
    Med Phys; 1996 Sep; 23(9):1531-5. PubMed ID: 8892250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method to check the accuracy of dose computation using quality index: application to scatter contribution in high energy photon beams.
    Caneva S; Rosenwald JC; Zefkili S
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):1018-24. PubMed ID: 10841405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.
    Ahmad M; Deng J; Lund MW; Chen Z; Kimmett J; Moran MS; Nath R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
    Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scatter kernel estimation with an edge-spread function method for cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
    Li H; Mohan R; Zhu XR
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6729-48. PubMed ID: 18997269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A finite size pencil beam algorithm for IMRT dose optimization: density corrections.
    Jeleń U; Alber M
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):617-33. PubMed ID: 17228109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of analytic source models for head scatter factor calculation and planar dose calculation for IMRT.
    Yan G; Liu C; Lu B; Palta JR; Li JG
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(8):2051-67. PubMed ID: 18364554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic field effects on the energy deposition spectra of MV photon radiation.
    Kirkby C; Stanescu T; Fallone BG
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 19088391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of the dose calculation accuracy for IMRT in lung: a 2D approach.
    Dvorak P; Stock M; Kroupa B; Bogner J; Georg D
    Acta Oncol; 2007; 46(7):928-36. PubMed ID: 17917824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A three-Gaussian fit of phantom scatter correction data.
    van Gasteren JJ; van der Laarse R; Venselaar JL; Heukelom S; Jager HN; van Kleffens HJ; Westermann CF
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Mar; 43(3):577-85. PubMed ID: 9533136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Room scatter factor modelling and measurement error analysis of 192Ir HDR calibration by a Farmer chamber.
    Chang L; Ho SY; Chui CS; Du YC; Chen T
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):871-7. PubMed ID: 17228126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stochastic versus deterministic kernel-based superposition approaches for dose calculation of intensity-modulated arcs.
    Tang G; Earl MA; Luan S; Wang C; Cao D; Yu CX; Naqvi SA
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4733-46. PubMed ID: 18701770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of parameters for a multiple-source model of megavoltage photon beams using optimization methods.
    Tillikainen L; Siljamäki S; Helminen H; Alakuijala J; Pyyry J
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1441-67. PubMed ID: 17301464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fourier deconvolution reveals the role of the Lorentz function as the convolution kernel of narrow photon beams.
    Djouguela A; Harder D; Kollhoff R; Foschepoth S; Kunth W; Rühmann A; Willborn K; Poppe B
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2807-27. PubMed ID: 19369712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of scatter material on diode detector performance for in vivo dosimetry.
    Best S; Ralston A; McKenzie D; Suchowerska N
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 18182689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A beam source model for scanned proton beams.
    Kimstrand P; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A; Grusell E; Glimelius B; Tilly N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3151-68. PubMed ID: 17505095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two methods to compute the absorbed dose to water for photon beams.
    Gardner JK; Siebers JV; Kawrakow I
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):N439-47. PubMed ID: 17881794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.