BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17110857)

  • 1. Dual energy subtraction digital radiography: technical considerations, clinical applications, and imaging pitfalls.
    Gilkeson RC; Sachs PB
    J Thorac Imaging; 2006 Nov; 21(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 17110857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis and dual-energy subtraction radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: initial evaluations in human clinical cases.
    Gomi T; Nozaki M; Takeda T; Umeda T; Takahashi K; Nakajima M
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1357-63. PubMed ID: 24119347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with dual-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
    Uemura M; Miyagawa M; Yasuhara Y; Murakami T; Ikura H; Sakamoto K; Tagashira H; Arakawa K; Mochizuki T
    Radiat Med; 2005 Sep; 23(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 16389980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lung nodule detection by microdose CT versus chest radiography (standard and dual-energy subtracted).
    Ebner L; Bütikofer Y; Ott D; Huber A; Landau J; Roos JE; Heverhagen JT; Christe A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):727-35. PubMed ID: 25794062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of digital tomosynthesis and dual energy subtraction digital radiography in detecting pulmonary nodules.
    Kumar SG; Garg MK; Khandelwal N; Gupta P; Gupta D; Aggarwal AN; Bansal SC
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1383-91. PubMed ID: 25892052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual energy subtraction digital radiography improves performance of a next generation computer-aided detection program.
    Balkman JD; Mehandru S; DuPont E; Novak RD; Gilkeson RC
    J Thorac Imaging; 2010 Feb; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 20160602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-exposure dual-energy chest images with computed radiography. Evaluation with simulated pulmonary nodules.
    Kido S; Ikezoe J; Naito H; Tamura S; Kozuka T; Ito W; Shimura K; Kato H
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Jun; 28(6):482-7. PubMed ID: 8320065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical application of single dual-energy subtraction technique with digital storage-phosphor radiography.
    Kamimura R; Takashima T
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):21-4. PubMed ID: 7734535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis imaging and dual-energy subtraction radiography to detect simulated pulmonary nodules with and without calcifications a phantom study.
    Gomi T; Nakajima M; Fujiwara H; Umeda T
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 21232683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improvement in detection of pulmonary nodules: digital image processing and computer-aided diagnosis.
    MacMahon H
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):1169-77. PubMed ID: 10903706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules.
    Kelcz F; Zink FE; Peppler WW; Kruger DG; Ergun DL; Mistretta CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual energy subtraction and temporal subtraction chest radiography.
    MacMahon H; Li F; Engelmann R; Roberts R; Armato S
    J Thorac Imaging; 2008 May; 23(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 18520564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of small pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: efficacy of dual-energy subtraction technique using flat-panel detector chest radiography.
    Oda S; Awai K; Funama Y; Utsunomiya D; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Nakaura T; Hirai T; Murakami R; Nomori H; Yamashita Y
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Aug; 65(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 20599062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monoenergetic Dual-energy Computed Tomographic Imaging: Cardiothoracic Applications.
    Lenga L; Albrecht MH; Othman AE; Martin SS; Leithner D; D'Angelo T; Arendt C; Scholtz JE; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Vogl TJ; Wichmann JL
    J Thorac Imaging; 2017 May; 32(3):151-158. PubMed ID: 28198752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual-energy Computed Tomography for the Evaluation of Enhancement of Pulmonary Nodules≤3 cm in Size.
    Reiter MJ; Winkler WT; Kagy KE; Schwope RB; Lisanti CJ
    J Thorac Imaging; 2017 May; 32(3):189-197. PubMed ID: 28338536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chest radiography: new technological developments and their applications.
    Schalekamp S; van Ginneken B; Karssemeijer N; Schaefer-Prokop CM
    Semin Respir Crit Care Med; 2014 Feb; 35(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 24481755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The advantage of digital tomosynthesis for pulmonary nodule detection concerning influence of nodule location and size: a phantom study.
    Kim EY; Bista AB; Kim T; Park SY; Park KJ; Kang DK; Sun JS
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Sep; 72(9):796.e1-796.e8. PubMed ID: 28454640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Thoracic Oncology.
    Odisio EG; Truong MT; Duran C; de Groot PM; Godoy MC
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2018 Jul; 56(4):535-548. PubMed ID: 29936946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Color radiography in lung nodule detection and characterization: comparison with conventional gray scale radiography.
    Song I; Yi JG; Park JH; Lee KS; Chung MJ
    BMC Med Imaging; 2016 Aug; 16(1):48. PubMed ID: 27549084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: detection of pulmonary nodules and masses in clinical practice.
    Szucs-Farkas Z; Patak MA; Yuksel-Hatz S; Ruder T; Vock P
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 17899105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.