239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17110921)
1. A guide for diagnostic evaluations.
Peeling RW; Smith PG; Bossuyt PM
Nat Rev Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 4(12 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 17110921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A guide for diagnostic evaluations.
Peeling RW; Smith PG; Bossuyt PM
Nat Rev Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 4(9 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 17003769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A guide for diagnostic evaluations.
Peeling RW; Smith PG; Bossuyt PM
Nat Rev Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 6(11 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 22745953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A guide for diagnostic evaluations.
Peeling RW; Smith PG; Bossuyt PM
Nat Rev Microbiol; 2010 Dec; 8(12 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 21548182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.
Banoo S; Bell D; Bossuyt P; Herring A; Mabey D; Poole F; Smith PG; Sriram N; Wongsrichanalai C; Linke R; O'Brien R; Perkins M; Cunningham J; Matsoso P; Nathanson CM; Olliaro P; Peeling RW; Ramsay A;
Nat Rev Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 4(12 Suppl):S20-32. PubMed ID: 17366684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An overview of meta-analyses of diagnostic tests in infectious diseases.
Cruciani M; Mengoli C
Infect Dis Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 23(2):225-67, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 19393907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Why do we need quality-assured diagnostic tests for sexually transmitted infections?
Peeling RW; Mabey D; Herring A; Hook EW
Nat Rev Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 4(12 Suppl):S7-19. PubMed ID: 17110922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies.
Brozek JL; Akl EA; Jaeschke R; Lang DM; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Ueffing E; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl J; Phillips B; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
Allergy; 2009 Aug; 64(8):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19489757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostics for the developing world.
Mabey D; Peeling RW; Ustianowski A; Perkins MD
Nat Rev Microbiol; 2004 Mar; 2(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 15083158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A toxicologist's guide to studying diagnostic tests.
Bailey B; Amre DK
Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2005; 43(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 15902791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concept paper: establishment of a diagnostics platform for South Africa.
Moodley I; Bubb M; Msomi N
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2007; 36 Suppl():19-22. PubMed ID: 17703559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimal requirements for test evaluation.
Magid E
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1997; 227():90-4. PubMed ID: 9127473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Development of antituberculous drugs: current status and future prospects].
Tomioka H; Namba K
Kekkaku; 2006 Dec; 81(12):753-74. PubMed ID: 17240921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The evaluation of diagnostic tests: evidence on technical and diagnostic accuracy, impact on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness is needed.
Van den Bruel A; Cleemput I; Aertgeerts B; Ramaekers D; Buntinx F
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 60(11):1116-22. PubMed ID: 17938052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases.
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 516():291-334. PubMed ID: 19219590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a framework for international certification by OIE of diagnostic tests validated as fit for purpose.
Wright P; Edwards S; Diallo A; Jacobson R
Dev Biol (Basel); 2006; 126():43-51; discussion 324-5. PubMed ID: 17058480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Guidelines for reporting information in studies of diagnostic test accuracy: the STARD initiative.
Meyer GJ
J Pers Assess; 2003 Dec; 81(3):191-3. PubMed ID: 14638443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.
Scott IA; Greenberg PB; Poole PJ
Intern Med J; 2008 Feb; 38(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 17645501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
