BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17111461)

  • 1. Evaluation and comparison of 50 Hz current threshold of electrocutaneous sensations using different methods.
    Lindenblatt G; Silny J
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Dec; 7(12):933-46. PubMed ID: 17111461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intermittent stimulation delays adaptation to electrocutaneous sensory feedback.
    Buma DG; Buitenweg JR; Veltink PH
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):435-41. PubMed ID: 17894276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pattern identification as a function of stimulation current on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
    Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 14518790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electric pulse frequency and magnitude of perceived sensation during electrocutaneous forearm stimulation.
    Jelinek HF; McIntyre R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1378-82. PubMed ID: 20801255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of ELF electromagnetic fields: excitation thresholds and inter-individual variability.
    Leitgeb N; Schröttner J; Cech R
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):591-5. PubMed ID: 17495660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximal dynamic range electrotactile stimulation waveforms.
    Kaczmarek KA; Webster JG; Radwin RG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Jul; 39(7):701-15. PubMed ID: 1516937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The perception threshold measurement can be a useful tool for evaluation of sensitive skin.
    Kim SJ; Lim SU; Won YH; An SS; Lee EY; Moon SJ; Kim J
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2008 Oct; 30(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 18822038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current perception thresholds in the lower urinary tract: Sine- and square-wave currents studied in young healthy volunteers.
    De Laet K; De Wachter S; Wyndaele JJ
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 15605369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Threshold of sensation for 60-Hz leakage current: results of a survey.
    Tan KS; Johnson DL
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1990; 24(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 2344552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Test of electric current perception thresholds at the fingertips--repeatability of the results].
    Zamysłowska-Szmytke E
    Med Pr; 1995; 46(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 9732847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skin nerve stimulation caused by low frequency electric field.
    Korniewicz HR
    Pol J Occup Med Environ Health; 1993; 6(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 8019204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pattern identification and perceived stimulus quality as a function of stimulation waveform on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
    Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Mar; 11(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12797720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of tolterodine on bladder-filling sensations and perception thresholds to intravesical electrical stimulation: method and initial results.
    Boy S; Schurch B; Mehnert U; Mehring G; Karsenty G; Reitz A
    BJU Int; 2007 Sep; 100(3):574-8. PubMed ID: 17669142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electric current perception study challenges electric safety limits.
    Leitgeb N; Schroettner J
    J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(4):168-72. PubMed ID: 12396332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in sensitivity to transient electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Larkin WD; Reilly JP; Kittler LB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1986 May; 33(5):495-504. PubMed ID: 3710505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the selective nature of sensory nerve stimulation using different sinusoidal frequencies.
    Langille M; Gonzalez-Cueto JA; Sundar S
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 118(8):1131-44. PubMed ID: 18576211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of local DC and AC electric fields in humans.
    Chapman CE; Blondin JP; Lapierre AM; Nguyen DH; Forget R; Plante M; Goulet D
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2005 Jul; 26(5):357-66. PubMed ID: 15887251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thresholds of microwave-evoked warmth sensations in human skin.
    Blick DW; Adair ER; Hurt WD; Sherry CJ; Walters TJ; Merritt JH
    Bioelectromagnetics; 1997; 18(6):403-9. PubMed ID: 9261536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does tolterodine extended release affect the bladder electrical perception threshold? A placebo controlled, double-blind study with 4 and 8 mg in healthy volunteers.
    Mehnert U; Reitz A; Ziegler M; Knapp PA; Schurch B
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2495-500. PubMed ID: 17937961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intramuscular sensation in conscious human subjects: a qualitative and quantitative study utilizing signal detection theory methodology.
    Murphy B; Dawson N; Irwin RJ
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2002; 19(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 12396574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.