606 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17111502)
41. Perry v. Louisiana: medical ethics on death row--is judicial intervention warranted?
Katz DL
Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(3):707-29. PubMed ID: 12186078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Substituted judgement and the right to refuse shock treatment in Washington: In re Schuoler.
Marshall GS
Univ Puget Sound Law Rev; 1987; 11(1):167-92. PubMed ID: 16998979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The administration of psychotropic drugs to prisoners: state of the law and beyond.
Floyd J
Calif Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 78(5):1243-85. PubMed ID: 11659407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. And some grow mad, and all grow bad: prisoners' constitutional right to receive psychiatric treatment.
Jennings EM
N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1985; 11(1):160-85. PubMed ID: 16100811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Supreme Court limits permissible scope of government's ability to force medication of mentally ill defendants.
Prieto-Gonzalez M
J Law Med Ethics; 2003; 31(4):737-9. PubMed ID: 14968679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Advance directives in a correctional setting.
Thomas DL; Watson JM
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):878-99. PubMed ID: 12455557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Still stuck in the cuckoo's nest: why do courts continue to rely on antiquated mental illness research?
Davoli JI
Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(4):987-1050. PubMed ID: 15295857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.
Quinlan M
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2005 Mar; (311):9-33. PubMed ID: 15869037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Singleton's story: choosing between psychosis and execution.
Spring JC
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(3):30-3. PubMed ID: 16092399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Involuntary medication treatment for competency restoration of 22 defendants with delusional disorder.
Herbel BL; Stelmach H
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 17389345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. New directions in the right to refuse mental health treatment: the implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
Winick BJ
William Mary Bill Rights J; 1993; 2(2):205-38. PubMed ID: 11659830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Right of a defendant to refuse antipsychotic medication during a criminal trial.
Williams KG
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Sep; 50(4):1937-9. PubMed ID: 11660177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Physicians should treat mentally ill death row inmates, even if treatment is refused.
McDonnell M; Phillips RT
J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(4):774-88. PubMed ID: 21105941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Major tranquilizers in prison: drug therapy and the unconsenting inmate.
Sitnick SA
Willamette Law J; 1975; 11(3):378-97. PubMed ID: 11664569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Adjusting Treatment for an Inmate-Patient Receiving Medication Involuntarily.
Williams JB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Jun; 43(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 26071513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A healer or an executioner? The proper role of a psychiatrist in a criminal justice system.
Dolin G
J Law Health; 2002-2003; 17(2):169-216. PubMed ID: 15853125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The judicial side effects of involuntary medication as it relates to a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial: Riggins v. Nevada.
Gutierrez L
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 19(2):355-77. PubMed ID: 11660111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Criminal madness: cultural iconography and insanity.
Covey RD
Stanford Law Rev; 2009 Apr; 61(6):1375-428. PubMed ID: 19489183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The right against treatment: behavior modification and the involuntarily committed.
Damich EJ
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1974; 23(4):774-87. PubMed ID: 11664362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
