504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17111524)
1. The legal status of embryos and implications for reproductive technologies and biotechnology research.
Bowens KK
J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17111524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In the beginning: the legal status of early embryos.
Robertson JA
Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):437-517. PubMed ID: 11659369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Embryonic stem cell research: one small step for science or one giant leap back for mankind?
Erwin CG
Univ Ill Law Rev; 2003; 2003(1):211-43. PubMed ID: 15568234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Growing pains: disputes surrounding human reproductive interests stretch the boundaries of traditional legal concepts.
Triber GA
Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):103-40. PubMed ID: 12755156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rights of embryo and foetus in private law.
Jost TS
Am J Comp Law; 2002; 50(3):633-46. PubMed ID: 15212066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Allocation of decision-making rights to frozen embryos.
Poole EK
Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(1):67-102. PubMed ID: 11659329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The present standing of the human embryo in U.S. law.
Avila D
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(2):203-26. PubMed ID: 12854540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Lengthening the stem: allowing federally funded researchers to derive human pluripotent stem cells from embryos.
Casell JH
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 2001; 34(3):547-72. PubMed ID: 16538744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of stem cells in biotechnological research.
Paegel NS
Whittier Law Rev; 2001; 22(4):1183-221. PubMed ID: 12774792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Of embryos and empire.
Cohen E
New Atlantis; 2003; (2):3-16. PubMed ID: 15584196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Frozen embryos: what are they and how should the law treat them?
Sublett MF
Clevel State Law Rev; 1990; 38(4):585-616. PubMed ID: 11659459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "What is an embryo?": a legal perspective.
Crockin SL
Conn Law Rev; 2004; 36(4):1177-86. PubMed ID: 15868681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
Sheinbach DM
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Embryos, stem cells, morality and public policy: difficult connections.
Momeyer RW
Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 15156894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproductive capacity: what does the embryo get?
Stephens KU
South Univ Law Rev; 1997; 24(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 16528857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stem cell research: is the law preventing progress?
Enmon JL
Utah Law Rev; 2002; (3):621-48. PubMed ID: 15156897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Gametes, embryos and the life in being: the impact of reproductive technology on the rule against perpetuities.
McCrimmon LA
Real Property Probate Trust J; 2000; 34(4):697-720. PubMed ID: 12449933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Excess embryos: is embryo adoption a new solution or a temporary fix?
Johnson ND
Brooklyn Law Rev; 2003; 68(3):853-83. PubMed ID: 15237519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cold shoulder treatment: the disposition of frozen embryos post-divorce.
King M
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1999 Fall-2000 Spring; 25(1-2):99-137. PubMed ID: 16211741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A postmodernist take on the human embryo research debate.
Noah L
Conn Law Rev; 2004; 36(4):1133-61. PubMed ID: 15868678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
