These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17111524)

  • 21. [The progressive legal vulnerability of embryonic human life in Spain: the law 35/1988 to 14/2006 and law 14/2007].
    Germán Zurriaráin R
    Cuad Bioet; 2009; 20(69):155-81. PubMed ID: 19507920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo.
    Cuva AJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The intersection of law and medicine: the case for providing federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.
    Newhart AB
    Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):329-61. PubMed ID: 16485376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Frozen embryos: towards an equitable solution.
    Trespalacios MJ
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 46(3):803-34. PubMed ID: 16047447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Davis v. Davis: the applicability of privacy and property rights to the disposition of frozen preembryos in intrafamilial disputes.
    Muller RJ
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1993; 24(3):763-804. PubMed ID: 11659794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Experimentation with extra embryos in Spain: comment on the 45/2003 Law that modifies the 35/1988 Law on assisted reproduction techniques].
    Lacadena JR
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2004; (20):177-94. PubMed ID: 15544149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The stem cell debate: the legal, political and ethical issues surrounding federal funding of scientific research on human embryos.
    George EP
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 2002; 12(2):747-803. PubMed ID: 15212013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Does 2009 mark a revival of embryonic stem cells?].
    López Moratalla N
    Cuad Bioet; 2009; 20(70):471-85. PubMed ID: 19799485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Guardianship and the IVF human embryo.
    Kasimba P; Buckle S
    Melb Univ Law Rev; 1989; 17():139-52. PubMed ID: 11659316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stem cell research and the human embryo. Part two.
    Furton EJ; Mathews-Roth MM
    Ethics Medics; 1999 Sep; 24(9):3-4. PubMed ID: 11660697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Roe and the new frontier.
    Roy LS
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 2003; 27(1):339-83. PubMed ID: 15568255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Property, progeny, and patents.
    Knowles LP
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(2):38-40. PubMed ID: 10321342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Confused heritage and the absurdity of genetic ownership.
    Silver LM; Silver SR
    Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):593-618. PubMed ID: 12731550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Davis dilemma: how to prevent battles over frozen preembryos.
    Panitch AR
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1991; 41(2):543-79. PubMed ID: 16127877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stem cells and the states: promulgating constitutional bans on embryonic experimentation.
    Harris MR
    Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 2002; 37(1):243-91. PubMed ID: 15214358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Against experimentation on human embryos.
    Gemelli A
    Eur J Genet Soc; 1997; 3(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 11657124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reflections on the United States National Institutes of Health draft guidelines for research involving human pluripotent stem cells--theological perspective.
    Sotis JJ
    Med Etika Bioet; 2000; 7(1-2):19-21. PubMed ID: 11933979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fathering a child from the grave: what are the inheritance rights of children born through new technology after the death of a parent?
    VanCannon K
    Drake Law Rev; 2004; 52(2):331-62. PubMed ID: 16755696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In-vitro fertilization, frozen embryos, and the right to privacy--are mandatory donation laws constitutional?
    Schaefer K
    Pac Law J; 1990 Oct; 22(1):87-121. PubMed ID: 16047419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The status of the human embryo from a gradualistic perspective].
    Alvarez-Díaz JA
    Gac Med Mex; 2007; 143(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 17722459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.