233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17111530)
1. Stem cell research debate shifting to the courts.
Vick KR
J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 17111530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. California makes unprecedented commitment to fund stem cell research.
Willard LA
J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(2):47-8. PubMed ID: 16538814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The California gambit. The Golden State has launched a 3bn dollar wager on stem cell science.
Gibbs WW
Sci Am; 2005 Jul; 293(1):A24-7. PubMed ID: 16008298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stem-cell lines.
Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 May; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15966127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The stem cell debate.
America (NY); 2004 Dec; 191(18):3. PubMed ID: 15685743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. California Stem Cell Research and Cures Act: what to expect from stem cell research?
Panetta J; Wetherell J; Mehok M
J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(4):3-12. PubMed ID: 16619447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Moving human embryonic stem cells from legislature to lab: remaining legal and ethical questions.
Greely HT
PLoS Med; 2006 Feb; 3(5):e143. PubMed ID: 16492089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stem cell work gets states' aid after Bush veto.
Rudoren J
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jul; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 16909489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Causative vs. beneficial complicity in the embryonic stem cell debate.
Robertson JA
Conn Law Rev; 2004; 36(4):1099-113. PubMed ID: 15868676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ballot drive puts stem-cell funding in voters' hands. In California, diabetes groups show growing influence as they push for research; big backing from Hollywood.
Regalado A; Waldholz M
Wall St J (East Ed); 2004 Mar; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 15250089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Government support for embryonic stem cell research.
Ekemo A
J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(4):66-7. PubMed ID: 16619449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stem cells. Court rules in favor of California stem cell institute.
Kaiser J
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5773):509. PubMed ID: 16645055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. California votes for embryonic stem cell research.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Dec; 22(12):1485-6. PubMed ID: 15583639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Embryonic stem cell research controversy: focus on the private sector and international sphere.
Kim S
Hastings Womens Law J; 2003; 14(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 16032810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stem cell debate. Scientists protest 'misrepresentation' as Senate vote looms.
Holden C
Science; 2007 Jan; 315(5810):315-6. PubMed ID: 17234921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The intersection of law and medicine: the case for providing federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.
Newhart AB
Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):329-61. PubMed ID: 16485376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. California. Stem cell research could be ballot issue.
Holden C
Science; 2004 Jan; 303(5656):293. PubMed ID: 14726560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A struggling science experiment: states closely watch California's stem cell research initiative.
Cha AE
Washington Post; 2005 Feb; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 15742520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research: an institutional examination.
Fujikawa R
South Calif Law Rev; 2005 May; 78(4):1075-124. PubMed ID: 17340756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Who said murder?
New Sci; 2006 Jul 29-Aug 4; 191(2562):3. PubMed ID: 17115485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
