These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17111553)

  • 1. Contested bodies: property models and the commodification of human biological artefacts.
    Parry B; Gere C
    Sci Cult (Lond); 2006 Jun; 15(2):139-58. PubMed ID: 17111553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The human body as property? Possession, control and commodification.
    Goold I; Skene L; Herring J; Greasley K
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Jan; 40(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24336397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ownership and use of tissue specimens for research.
    Catalona WJ
    JAMA; 2005 Mar; 293(11):1325; author reply 1325-6. PubMed ID: 15769964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Owning our bodies: an examination of property law and biotechnology.
    Gold R
    San Diego Law Rev; 1995; 32(4):1167-247. PubMed ID: 11656846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The new French resistance: commodification rejected?
    Dickenson D
    Med Law Int; 2005; 7(1):41-63. PubMed ID: 16622985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fragmented bodies, ideal privilege, and commodification in science and medicine.
    Perry MM
    Maine Law Rev; 1999; 51(1):169-210. PubMed ID: 12741402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The inscription of life in law: genes, patents, and bio-politics.
    Pottage A
    Mod Law Rev; 1998 Sep; 61(5):740-65. PubMed ID: 14518448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Homo economicus: commercialization of body tissue in the age of biotechnology.
    Nelkin D; Andrews L
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(5):30-9. PubMed ID: 11656768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proprietary rights in body parts: the relevance of Moore's case in Australia.
    Mortimer D
    Monash Univ Law Rev; 1993; 19(1):217-25. PubMed ID: 17333577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human property: threat or saviour?
    Taylor R
    E Law; 2002 Dec; 9(4):E4. PubMed ID: 16903023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research ethics. Children and population biobanks.
    Gurwitz D; Fortier I; Lunshof JE; Knoppers BM
    Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5942):818-9. PubMed ID: 19679798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biotechnology and the legal constitution of the self: managing identity in science, the market, and society.
    Kahn J
    Hastings Law J; 2000 Jul; 51(5):909-52. PubMed ID: 12171097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defining diagnostic tissue in the era of personalized medicine.
    Cheung CC; Martin BR; Asa SL
    CMAJ; 2013 Feb; 185(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 22825998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward a just model of alienability of human tissue.
    Budds B
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 2003; 37(3):757-82. PubMed ID: 16514784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The ethics of biobanking: key issues and controversies.
    Widdows H; Cordell S
    Health Care Anal; 2011 Sep; 19(3):207-19. PubMed ID: 21779971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An interest in human dignity as the basis for genomic torts.
    Brownsword R
    Washburn Law J; 2003; 42(3):413-81. PubMed ID: 15112710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Taking the least of you: most of us have tissue or blood samples on file somewhere, whether we know it or not. What we don't typically know is what research they are being used for or how much money is being made from them. And science may want to keep things that way.
    Skloot R
    N Y Times Mag; 2006 Apr; ():38-45, 75, 79, 81. PubMed ID: 16715570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Banking biological collections.
    Blatt RJ
    J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 2(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 11657636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: patients, property rights, and public policy.
    Biagi KG
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1991; 35(2):433-62. PubMed ID: 16144099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Partnership in U.K. Biobank: a third way for genomic property?
    Winickoff DE
    J Law Med Ethics; 2007; 35(3):440-56. PubMed ID: 17714253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.