1257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17112395)
1. An alternative strategy for universal infant hearing screening in tertiary hospitals with a high delivery rate, within a developing country, using transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry.
Mathur NN; Dhawan R
J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jul; 121(7):639-43. PubMed ID: 17112395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening programs: protocol for developing countries.
Bansal S; Gupta A; Nagarkar A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 72(7):1059-63. PubMed ID: 18479757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Neonatal hearing screening. A comparison of automatic auditory brainstem audiometry and otoacoustic emissions].
Pedersen L; Møller TR; Wetke R; Ovesen T
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Feb; 170(8):642-6. PubMed ID: 18364157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs.
Benito-Orejas JI; Ramírez B; Morais D; Almaraz A; Fernández-Calvo JL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Aug; 72(8):1193-201. PubMed ID: 18550180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Newborn hearing screening: costs of establishing a program.
Lemons J; Fanaroff A; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Murray G; Diefendorf A
J Perinatol; 2002 Mar; 22(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 11896516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.
Suppiej A; Rizzardi E; Zanardo V; Franzoi M; Ermani M; Orzan E
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Newborn hearing screening programme outcomes in a research hospital from Turkey.
Tasci Y; Muderris II; Erkaya S; Altinbas S; Yucel H; Haberal A
Child Care Health Dev; 2010 May; 36(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 20015280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Universal neonatal hearing screening: the Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns.
De Capua B; Costantini D; Martufi C; Latini G; Gentile M; De Felice C
Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):601-6. PubMed ID: 17307313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response.
Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Ho GM; Fu TY; Bruna S; Lin G
Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of automated auditory brainstem responses and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions for universal newborn hearing screening.
Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Lyra C; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E
Med Sci Monit; 2006 Jun; 12(6):CR260-3. PubMed ID: 16733484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening for early detection of permanent congenital hearing loss in Lagos, Nigeria.
Olusanya BO; Wirz SL; Luxon LM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 72(7):991-1001. PubMed ID: 18433883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Hearing screening of 10,501 newborns].
Nie WY; Gong LX; Liu YJ; Xiang LL; Lin Q; Qi YS; Nie YJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 83(4):274-7. PubMed ID: 12812640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in the first month of life.
Prieve BA; Hancur-Bucci CA; Preston JL
Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):330-9. PubMed ID: 19322090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The frequency of auditory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing screening program.
Kirkim G; Serbetcioglu B; Erdag TK; Ceryan K
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1461-9. PubMed ID: 18674822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol.
Johnson JL; White KR; Widen JE; Gravel JS; James M; Kennalley T; Maxon AB; Spivak L; Sullivan-Mahoney M; Vohr BR; Weirather Y; Holstrum J
Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 16140706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Otoacoustic emissions for newborn hearing screening].
Liao H; Wu Z; Zhou T
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Feb; 34(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 12764789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors.
De Capua B; De Felice C; Costantini D; Bagnoli F; Passali D
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Feb; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12812130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Universal newborn hearing screening: feasibility in a community hospital.
Huynh MT; Pollack RA; Cunningham RA
J Fam Pract; 1996 May; 42(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 8642366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Newborn hearing screening and strategy for early detection of hearing loss in infants.
Jakubíková J; Kabátová Z; Pavlovcinová G; Profant M
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):607-12. PubMed ID: 19185924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Universal newborn hearing screening: a 27-month experience in the French region of Champagne-Ardenne.
Lévêque M; Schmidt P; Leroux B; Danvin JB; Langagne T; Labrousse M; Chays A
Acta Paediatr; 2007 Aug; 96(8):1150-4. PubMed ID: 17578491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
