These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17113180)

  • 1. Public responses to precautionary information from the Department of Health (UK) about possible health risks from mobile phones.
    Barnett J; Timotijevic L; Shepherd R; Senior V
    Health Policy; 2007 Jul; 82(2):240-50. PubMed ID: 17113180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The (co-)production of public uncertainty: UK scientific advice on mobile phone health risks.
    Stilgoe J
    Public Underst Sci; 2007 Jan; 16(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 17575708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The precautionary principle: advantages and risks].
    Tubiana M
    J Chir (Paris); 2001 Apr; 138(2):68-80. PubMed ID: 11319454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Conclusions. The precautionary principle: its advantages and risks].
    Tubiana M
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2000; 184(5):969-93. PubMed ID: 11077719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mobile phone collection, reuse and recycling in the UK.
    Ongondo FO; Williams ID
    Waste Manag; 2011 Jun; 31(6):1307-15. PubMed ID: 21376556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The precautionary principle in the context of mobile phone and base station radiofrequency exposures.
    Dolan M; Rowley J
    Environ Health Perspect; 2009 Sep; 117(9):1329-32. PubMed ID: 19750093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When precaution creates misunderstandings: the unintended effects of precautionary information on perceived risks, the EMF case.
    Wiedemann PM; Schuetz H; Boerner F; Clauberg M; Croft R; Shukla R; Kikkawa T; Kemp R; Gutteling JM; de Villiers B; da Silva Medeiros FN; Barnett J
    Risk Anal; 2013 Oct; 33(10):1788-801. PubMed ID: 23551041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of mobile phone messaging in prevention of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle modification in men in India: a prospective, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial.
    Ramachandran A; Snehalatha C; Ram J; Selvam S; Simon M; Nanditha A; Shetty AS; Godsland IF; Chaturvedi N; Majeed A; Oliver N; Toumazou C; Alberti KG; Johnston DG
    Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol; 2013 Nov; 1(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 24622367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes.
    Capon A; Gillespie J; Rolfe M; Smith W
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Apr; 15():424. PubMed ID: 25928741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk perceptions of mobile phone use while driving.
    White MP; Eiser JR; Harris PR
    Risk Anal; 2004 Apr; 24(2):323-34. PubMed ID: 15078303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NHS connecting for health: healthcare professionals, mobile technology, and infection control.
    Brady RR; Chitnis S; Stewart RW; Graham C; Yalamarthi S; Morris K
    Telemed J E Health; 2012 May; 18(4):289-91. PubMed ID: 22428552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using reality mining to improve public health and medicine.
    Pentland A; Lazer D; Brewer D; Heibeck T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 149():93-102. PubMed ID: 19745474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Determining health policy for sensible mobile phone use--current world status].
    Sagi OI; Sadetzki S
    Harefuah; 2011 Mar; 150(3):216-20, 306. PubMed ID: 21574350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clear policies on mobile phones vital.
    Health Estate; 2007 Aug; 61(7):35-7. PubMed ID: 17847875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cell phones and health concerns: impact of knowledge and voluntary precautionary recommendations.
    Cousin ME; Siegrist M
    Risk Anal; 2011 Feb; 31(2):301-11. PubMed ID: 20880217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mobile phones: time to rethink and limit usage.
    Paul B; Saha I; Kumar S; Samim Ferdows SK; Ghose G
    Indian J Public Health; 2015; 59(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 25758729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effects of Precautionary Messages about Electromagnetic Fields from Mobile Phones and Base Stations Revisited: The Role of Recipient Characteristics.
    Boehmert C; Wiedemann P; Pye J; Croft R
    Risk Anal; 2017 Mar; 37(3):583-597. PubMed ID: 27163281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Mexican flu: risk perception in the general public, precautionary measures and trust in information provided by the government].
    Bults M; Beaujean DJ; de Zwart O; Kok G; van Empelen P; van Steenbergen JE; Richardus JH; Voeten HA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A1686. PubMed ID: 20482914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mobile phones. precautionary options.
    Black DR
    Med Lav; 2006; 97(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 17017353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk and benefit perceptions of mobile phone and base station technology in Bangladesh.
    van Kleef E; Fischer AR; Khan M; Frewer LJ
    Risk Anal; 2010 Jun; 30(6):1002-15. PubMed ID: 20409037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.