340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17113440)
1. The early psychological adjustment of cleft patients after maxillary distraction osteogenesis and conventional orthognathic surgery: a preliminary study.
Cheung LK; Loh JS; Ho SM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 64(12):1743-50. PubMed ID: 17113440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The comparison of psychological adjustment of patients with cleft lip and palate after maxillary distraction osteogenesis and conventional orthognathic surgery.
Chua HD; Ho SM; Cheung LK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Nov; 114(5 Suppl):S5-10. PubMed ID: 23083956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonunion of the external maxillary distraction in cleft lip and palate: analysis of possible reasons.
He D; Genecov DG; Barcelo R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2402-11. PubMed ID: 20605305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Maxillary distraction complications in cleft patients].
Jeblaoui Y; Morand B; Brix M; Lebeau J; Bettega G
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2008 Sep; 109(4):218-24, discussion 224-5. PubMed ID: 18703208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distraction or osteotomy for the correction of maxillary cleft deformities: which is better?
Cheung LK; Chua HD; Bendeus M
Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2004 Oct; 17():57-63. PubMed ID: 16479857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis.
Cheung LK; Chua HD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16154316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distraction or orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients: which is better?
Cheung LK; Chua HD
Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2008 Jun; 19():133-5. PubMed ID: 22073466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Soft tissue changes from maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate--a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Chua HD; Cheung LK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1648-58. PubMed ID: 21958662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis in nongrowing patients.
Kanno T; Mitsugi M; Hosoe M; Sukegawa S; Yamauchi K; Furuki Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1833-46. PubMed ID: 18718390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.
Kloukos D; Fudalej P; Sequeira-Byron P; Katsaros C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD010403. PubMed ID: 30095853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery--which one is more stable in 5 years?
Chua HD; Hägg MB; Cheung LK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jun; 109(6):803-14. PubMed ID: 20299247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adult patients with treated complete cleft lip and palate. Methodological and clinical studies.
Marcusson A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2001; (145):1-57. PubMed ID: 11400538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Midfacial changes through distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction system with retention plates in cleft lip and palate patients.
Daimaruya T; Imai Y; Kochi S; Tachi M; Takano-Yamamoto T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1480-6. PubMed ID: 20417011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Orthognathic surgery in the young cleft patient: preliminary study on subsequent facial growth.
Wolford LM; Cassano DS; Cottrell DA; El Deeb M; Karras SC; Goncalves JR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 66(12):2524-36. PubMed ID: 19022133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment of retruded maxilla in cleft lip and palate--orthognathic surgery versus distraction osteogenesis: the case for orthognathic surgery.
Precious DS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 65(4):758-61. PubMed ID: 17368375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery in cleft lip and palate patients: effects on speech and velopharyngeal function.
Chua HD; Whitehill TL; Samman N; Cheung LK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 39(7):633-40. PubMed ID: 20413269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maxillary distraction complications in cleft patients.
Jeblaoui Y; Morand B; Brix M; Lebeau J; Bettega G
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2010 Jun; 111(3):e1-6. PubMed ID: 20553705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A simple mechanism for measuring and adjusting distraction forces during maxillary advancement.
Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2245-53. PubMed ID: 19761920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Soft tissue profile changes of the midface in patients with cleft lip and palate following maxillary distraction osteogenesis: a preliminary study.
Harada K; Baba Y; Ohyama K; Omura K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Dec; 94(6):673-7. PubMed ID: 12464889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate patients with skeletal anchorage.
Minami K; Mori Y; Tae-Geon K; Shimizu H; Ohtani M; Yura Y
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2007 Mar; 44(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 17328638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
