230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17113666)
1. High density dental materials and radiotherapy planning: comparison of the dose predictions using superposition algorithm and fluence map Monte Carlo method with radiochromic film measurements.
Spirydovich S; Papiez L; Langer M; Sandison G; Thai V
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Dec; 81(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 17113666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental verification of lung dose with radiochromic film: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations and commercially available treatment planning systems.
Paelinck L; Reynaert N; Thierens H; De Neve W; De Wagter C
Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(9):2055-69. PubMed ID: 15843736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose calculation accuracy of the Monte Carlo algorithm for CyberKnife compared with other commercially available dose calculation algorithms.
Sharma S; Ott J; Williams J; Dickow D
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 21144731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. IMRT head and neck treatment planning with a commercially available Monte Carlo based planning system.
Boudreau C; Heath E; Seuntjens J; Ballivy O; Parker W
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):879-90. PubMed ID: 15798262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The next step in patient-specific QA: 3D dose verification of conformal and intensity-modulated RT based on EPID dosimetry and Monte Carlo dose calculations.
van Elmpt W; Nijsten S; Mijnheer B; Dekker A; Lambin P
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18054102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A finite size pencil beam algorithm for IMRT dose optimization: density corrections.
Jeleń U; Alber M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):617-33. PubMed ID: 17228109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monte Carlo-based dosimetry of head-and-neck patients treated with SIB-IMRT.
Sakthi N; Keall P; Mihaylov I; Wu Q; Wu Y; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich R; Siebers JV
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Mar; 64(3):968-77. PubMed ID: 16458782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of Monte Carlo dose calculation denoising techniques.
El Naqa I; Kawrakow I; Fippel M; Siebers JV; Lindsay PE; Wickerhauser MV; Vicic M; Zakarian K; Kauffmann N; Deasy JO
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):909-22. PubMed ID: 15798264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The Monte Carlo method and parallel estimation in the drawing up of radiosurgery treatment plans].
Scielzo G; Grillo Ruggieri F; Schwarz M; Rivolta A; Brunelli B; Surridge M; Gill A; Rietbrock C
Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):647-55. PubMed ID: 9717550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo modeling of the ModuLeaf miniature MLC for small field dosimetry and quality assurance of the clinical treatment planning system.
Crop F; Reynaert N; Pittomvils G; Paelinck L; De Gersem W; De Wagter C; Vakaet L; De Neve W; Thierens H
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3275-90. PubMed ID: 17505102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Electron fields in clinical application. A comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithm].
Treutwein M; Bogner L
Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Aug; 183(8):454-8. PubMed ID: 17680226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The dosimetric effects of tissue heterogeneities in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of the head and neck.
Al-Hallaq HA; Reft CS; Roeske JC
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1145-56. PubMed ID: 16481684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monochromatic beam characterization for Auger electron dosimetry and radiotherapy.
Dugas JP; Oves SD; Sajo E; Matthews KL; Ham K; Hogstrom KR
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S137-41. PubMed ID: 18599232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose distribution for endovascular brachytherapy using Ir-192 sources: comparison of Monte Carlo calculations with radiochromic film measurements.
Sureka CS; Sunny CS; Subbaiah KV; Aruna P; Ganesan S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(2):525-37. PubMed ID: 17202631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient-specific dosimetry of conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy using a novel full Monte Carlo phase space reconstruction method from electronic portal images.
Jarry G; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2277-99. PubMed ID: 17404469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A preliminary study of in-house Monte Carlo simulations: an integrated Monte Carlo verification system.
Mukumoto N; Tsujii K; Saito S; Yasunaga M; Takegawa H; Yamamoto T; Numasaki H; Teshima T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct; 75(2):571-9. PubMed ID: 19735883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
