177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17114358)
1. A comparison of transcriptomic and metabonomic technologies for identifying biomarkers predictive of two-year rodent cancer bioassays.
Thomas RS; O'Connell TM; Pluta L; Wolfinger RD; Yang L; Page TJ
Toxicol Sci; 2007 Mar; 96(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 17114358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of genomic biomarkers to predict increased lung tumor incidence in 2-year rodent cancer bioassays.
Thomas RS; Pluta L; Yang L; Halsey TA
Toxicol Sci; 2007 May; 97(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 17311802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
Gaylor DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of hepatocarcinogen-induced gene expression profiles in conventional primary rat hepatocytes with in vivo rat liver.
Doktorova TY; Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Vinken M; Vanhaecke T; van Delft J; Kleinjans J; Ahr HJ; Rogiers V
Arch Toxicol; 2012 Sep; 86(9):1399-411. PubMed ID: 22484513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of a carcinogenic potential of rat hepatocarcinogens using toxicogenomics analysis of short-term in vivo studies.
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Gmuender H; Bandenburg A; Ahr HJ
Mutat Res; 2008 Jan; 637(1-2):23-39. PubMed ID: 17689568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of transcriptional benchmark dose values in quantitative cancer and noncancer risk assessment.
Thomas RS; Clewell HJ; Allen BC; Wesselkamper SC; Wang NC; Lambert JC; Hess-Wilson JK; Zhao QJ; Andersen ME
Toxicol Sci; 2011 Mar; 120(1):194-205. PubMed ID: 21097997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the expression profiles induced by genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens in rat liver.
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Stuart B; Wahle B; Bomann W; Ahr HJ
Mutat Res; 2005 Aug; 575(1-2):61-84. PubMed ID: 15890375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of potential biomarkers of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells by cDNA microarray analysis.
Kim JY; Kwon J; Kim JE; Koh WS; Chung MK; Yoon S; Song CW; Lee M
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2005; 45(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 15612046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of short-term transcriptional profiles to assess the long-term cancer-related safety of environmental and industrial chemicals.
Thomas RS; Bao W; Chu TM; Bessarabova M; Nikolskaya T; Nikolsky Y; Andersen ME; Wolfinger RD
Toxicol Sci; 2009 Dec; 112(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 19776212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. NTP toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 126) (CAS No. 57465-28-8) in female Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats (Gavage Studies).
National Toxicology Program
Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 2006 Jan; (520):4-246. PubMed ID: 16628245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toxicogenomics applied to in vitro carcinogenicity testing with Balb/c 3T3 cells revealed a gene signature predictive of chemical carcinogens.
Rohrbeck A; Salinas G; Maaser K; Linge J; Salovaara S; Corvi R; Borlak J
Toxicol Sci; 2010 Nov; 118(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 20713471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive toxicogenomics approaches reveal underlying molecular mechanisms of nongenotoxic carcinogenicity.
Nie AY; McMillian M; Parker JB; Leone A; Bryant S; Yieh L; Bittner A; Nelson J; Carmen A; Wan J; Lord PG
Mol Carcinog; 2006 Dec; 45(12):914-33. PubMed ID: 16921489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of tumor promotion marker genes for predicting tumor promoting potential of chemicals in BALB/c 3T3 cells.
Maeshima H; Ohno K; Tanaka-Azuma Y; Nakano S; Yamada T
Toxicol In Vitro; 2009 Feb; 23(1):148-57. PubMed ID: 19000923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finding transcriptomics biomarkers for in vivo identification of (non-)genotoxic carcinogens using wild-type and Xpa/p53 mutant mouse models.
Jonker MJ; Bruning O; van Iterson M; Schaap MM; van der Hoeven TV; Vrieling H; Beems RB; de Vries A; van Steeg H; Breit TM; Luijten M
Carcinogenesis; 2009 Oct; 30(10):1805-12. PubMed ID: 19696161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterizing and predicting carcinogenicity and mode of action using conventional and toxicogenomics methods.
Waters MD; Jackson M; Lea I
Mutat Res; 2010 Dec; 705(3):184-200. PubMed ID: 20399889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Dietary Restriction on Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice.
National Toxicology Program
Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 1997 Sep; 460():1-414. PubMed ID: 12587016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of non-genotoxic carcinogenesis in rats using changes in gene expression following acute dosing.
Nioi P; Pardo ID; Sherratt PJ; Snyder RD
Chem Biol Interact; 2008 Apr; 172(3):206-15. PubMed ID: 18328469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
