BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

655 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17114541)

  • 1. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
    Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting.
    Birdwell RL; Bandodkar P; Ikeda DM
    Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):451-7. PubMed ID: 16040901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
    Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
    Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center.
    Freer TW; Ulissey MJ
    Radiology; 2001 Sep; 220(3):781-6. PubMed ID: 11526282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers.
    Dean JC; Ilvento CC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 16794150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
    Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists.
    van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Boetes C; Flobbe K
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Apr; 120(2):499-506. PubMed ID: 19418215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Hofvind S; Jahr G; Castellino RA
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 22287148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography.
    Warren Burhenne LJ; Wood SA; D'Orsi CJ; Feig SA; Kopans DB; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Tabar L; Vyborny CJ; Castellino RA
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 10796939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography.
    Georgian-Smith D; Moore RH; Halpern E; Yeh ED; Rafferty EA; D'Alessandro HA; Staffa M; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; Kopans DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1135-41. PubMed ID: 17954651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aspects in mammographic screening. Detection, prediction, recurrence and prognosis.
    Thurfjell MG
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2001 Dec; 42(424):1-22. PubMed ID: 12040855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
    Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammography: does it help the junior or the senior radiologist?
    Balleyguier C; Kinkel K; Fermanian J; Malan S; Djen G; Taourel P; Helenon O
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 54(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 15797297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion.
    Baker JA; Rosen EL; Lo JY; Gimenez EI; Walsh R; Soo MS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):1083-8. PubMed ID: 14500236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
    Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography.
    Taplin SH; Rutter CM; Lehman CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1475-82. PubMed ID: 17114540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer.
    Brem RF; Hoffmeister JW; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Mohtashemi K; Jindal G; Disimio MP; Rogers SK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 15671360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.