350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17114627)
1. Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography.
Yeshwant SC; Summers RM; Yao J; Brickman DS; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):802-11. PubMed ID: 17114627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Manual and automated polyp measurement comparison of CT colonography with optical colonoscopy.
Jeong JY; Kim MJ; Kim SS
Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 18206622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of polyp size and volume at CT colonography: implications for follow-up CT colonography.
Bethea E; Nwawka OK; Dachman AH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19933648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens.
Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Byeon JS; Jo JY; Kim YH; Lee KH; Ha HK; Han JK
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 17507724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: 3D endoluminal measurement with optimized surface-rendering threshold value and automated measurement.
Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Woo JY; Chung SY; Kim YJ; Han JK; Ha HK
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):157-67. PubMed ID: 18033755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study.
Taylor SA; Slater A; Halligan S; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME; Demeshski J; Amin H; Burling D
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 17105850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Polyp measurement using CT colonography: agreement with colonoscopy and effect of viewing conditions on interobserver and intraobserver agreement.
Burling D; Halligan S; Taylor S; Brennand DJ; Altman DG; Bassett P; Atkin W; Bartram CI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1597-604. PubMed ID: 16714648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of polyp distance on CT colonography between supine and prone scans using an automated path-distance measurement tool: correlation with colonoscopy.
Park HS; Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SG; Han JK; Choi BI
Abdom Imaging; 2010 Feb; 35(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 19089490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT colonography: automatic measurement of polyp diameter compared with manual assessment - an in-vivo study.
Burling D; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME
Clin Radiol; 2007 Feb; 62(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 17207697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polyp volume versus linear size measurements at CT colonography: implications for noninvasive surveillance of unresected colorectal lesions.
Pickhardt PJ; Lehman VT; Winter TC; Taylor AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1605-10. PubMed ID: 16714649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT colonography: effect of colonic distension on polyp measurement accuracy and agreement-in vitro study.
Taylor S; Slater A; Honeyfield L; Burling D; Halligan S
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):850-9. PubMed ID: 16777559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polyp measurement based on CT colonography and colonoscopy: variability and systematic differences.
de Vries AH; Bipat S; Dekker E; Liedenbaum MH; Florie J; Fockens P; van der Kraan R; Mathus-Vliegen EM; Reitsma JB; Truyen R; Vos FM; Zwinderman AH; Stoker J
Eur Radiol; 2010 Jun; 20(6):1404-13. PubMed ID: 20033180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT colonography predictably overestimates colonic length and distance to polyps compared with optical colonoscopy.
Duncan JE; McNally MP; Sweeney WB; Gentry AB; Barlow DS; Jensen DW; Cash BD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1291-5. PubMed ID: 19843744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive deformable model for colonic polyp segmentation and measurement on CT colonography.
Yao J; Summers RM
Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1655-64. PubMed ID: 17555247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT colonography with computer-aided polyp detection: volume and attenuation thresholds to reduce false-positive findings owing to the ileocecal valve.
O'Connor SD; Summers RM; Yao J; Pickhardt PJ; Choi JR
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):426-32. PubMed ID: 17005773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.
Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD
Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variation of agreement in polyp size measurement between computed tomographic colonography and pathology assessment: clinical implications.
Gupta S; Durkalski V; Cotton P; Rockey DC
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Feb; 6(2):220-7. PubMed ID: 18237871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method.
Gluecker TM; Fletcher JG; Welch TJ; MacCarty RL; Harmsen WS; Harrington JR; Ilstrup D; Wilson LA; Corcoran KE; Johnson CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 15039159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance.
McFarland EG; Pilgram TK; Brink JA; McDermott RA; Santillan CV; Brady PW; Heiken JP; Balfe DM; Weinstock LB; Thyssen EP; Littenberg B
Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):380-90. PubMed ID: 12409570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
