These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17114627)
1. Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography. Yeshwant SC; Summers RM; Yao J; Brickman DS; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):802-11. PubMed ID: 17114627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Manual and automated polyp measurement comparison of CT colonography with optical colonoscopy. Jeong JY; Kim MJ; Kim SS Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 18206622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of polyp size and volume at CT colonography: implications for follow-up CT colonography. Bethea E; Nwawka OK; Dachman AH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19933648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens. Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Byeon JS; Jo JY; Kim YH; Lee KH; Ha HK; Han JK Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 17507724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: 3D endoluminal measurement with optimized surface-rendering threshold value and automated measurement. Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Woo JY; Chung SY; Kim YJ; Han JK; Ha HK Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):157-67. PubMed ID: 18033755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study. Taylor SA; Slater A; Halligan S; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME; Demeshski J; Amin H; Burling D Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 17105850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays. Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Polyp measurement using CT colonography: agreement with colonoscopy and effect of viewing conditions on interobserver and intraobserver agreement. Burling D; Halligan S; Taylor S; Brennand DJ; Altman DG; Bassett P; Atkin W; Bartram CI AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1597-604. PubMed ID: 16714648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of polyp distance on CT colonography between supine and prone scans using an automated path-distance measurement tool: correlation with colonoscopy. Park HS; Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SG; Han JK; Choi BI Abdom Imaging; 2010 Feb; 35(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 19089490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT colonography: automatic measurement of polyp diameter compared with manual assessment - an in-vivo study. Burling D; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME Clin Radiol; 2007 Feb; 62(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 17207697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polyp volume versus linear size measurements at CT colonography: implications for noninvasive surveillance of unresected colorectal lesions. Pickhardt PJ; Lehman VT; Winter TC; Taylor AJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1605-10. PubMed ID: 16714649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT colonography: effect of colonic distension on polyp measurement accuracy and agreement-in vitro study. Taylor S; Slater A; Honeyfield L; Burling D; Halligan S Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):850-9. PubMed ID: 16777559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polyp measurement based on CT colonography and colonoscopy: variability and systematic differences. de Vries AH; Bipat S; Dekker E; Liedenbaum MH; Florie J; Fockens P; van der Kraan R; Mathus-Vliegen EM; Reitsma JB; Truyen R; Vos FM; Zwinderman AH; Stoker J Eur Radiol; 2010 Jun; 20(6):1404-13. PubMed ID: 20033180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive deformable model for colonic polyp segmentation and measurement on CT colonography. Yao J; Summers RM Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1655-64. PubMed ID: 17555247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT colonography with computer-aided polyp detection: volume and attenuation thresholds to reduce false-positive findings owing to the ileocecal valve. O'Connor SD; Summers RM; Yao J; Pickhardt PJ; Choi JR Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):426-32. PubMed ID: 17005773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variation of agreement in polyp size measurement between computed tomographic colonography and pathology assessment: clinical implications. Gupta S; Durkalski V; Cotton P; Rockey DC Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Feb; 6(2):220-7. PubMed ID: 18237871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method. Gluecker TM; Fletcher JG; Welch TJ; MacCarty RL; Harmsen WS; Harrington JR; Ilstrup D; Wilson LA; Corcoran KE; Johnson CD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 15039159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]