266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17115109)
1. Margin status and the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving treatment of lobular breast cancer.
van den Broek N; van der Sangen MJ; van de Poll-Franse LV; van Beek MW; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Voogd AC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 17115109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Breast-conserving treatment for early invasive lobular breast cancer: 15 years results].
Fodor J; Sulyok Z; Polgár C; Major T; Tóth J; Németh G
Magy Seb; 2001 Aug; 54(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 11550486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Second operation more frequent following breast-conserving treatment for invasive lobular than for invasive non-lobular carcinoma].
de Zeeuw S; Wildenberg F; Strobbe L; Wobbes T
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A56. PubMed ID: 19900317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of lobular carcinoma in situ in association with invasive breast cancer on the rate of local recurrence in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Jolly S; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS; Vicini FA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Oct; 66(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 16965988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonpalpable versus palpable invasive breast tumors treated with breast-conserving surgical management.
Tafra L; Essner R; Brenner RJ; Giuliano AE
Am Surg; 1996 May; 62(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 8615571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast conservation therapy for invasive lobular carcinoma: the impact of lobular carcinoma in situ in the surgical specimen on local recurrence and axillary node status.
Stolier AJ; Barre G; Bolton JS; Fuhrman GM; Looney S
Am Surg; 2004 Sep; 70(9):818-21. PubMed ID: 15481302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors predicting in-breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery.
Mechera R; Viehl CT; Oertli D
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Jul; 116(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 18815880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Defining negative margins in DCIS patients treated with breast conservation therapy: The University of Chicago experience.
Sahoo S; Recant WM; Jaskowiak N; Tong L; Heimann R
Breast J; 2005; 11(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 15982389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of margin status in breast-conserving therapy for lobular carcinoma is age related.
Jobsen JJ; Riemersma S; van der Palen J; Ong F; Jonkman A; Struikmans H
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Feb; 36(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 19647390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying patients at risk of compromised margins following breast conservation for lobular carcinoma.
Dillon MF; Hill AD; Fleming FJ; O'Doherty A; Quinn CM; McDermott EW; O'Higgins N
Am J Surg; 2006 Feb; 191(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 16442946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer.
Keskek M; Kothari M; Ardehali B; Betambeau N; Nasiri N; Gui GP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 30(10):1058-64. PubMed ID: 15522551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery.
Fleming FJ; Hill AD; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins NJ; Quinn CM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15028301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of local failure in breast cancer patients with lobular carcinoma in situ at the final surgical margins: is re-excision necessary?
Sadek BT; Shenouda MN; Abi Raad RF; Niemierko A; Keruakous AR; Goldberg SI; Taghian AG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):726-30. PubMed ID: 24064317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
Smitt MC; Horst K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Breast-conservation treatment for early invasive breast cancer: prognostic factors for survival after salvage treatment of local recurrence].
Fodor J
Magy Onkol; 2007; 51(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 17660868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of timing of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in patients with positive or close resection margins, young age, and node-negative disease, with long term follow-up.
Vujovic O; Cherian A; Yu E; Dar AR; Stitt L; Perera F
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(3):687-90. PubMed ID: 16949764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
