BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17115338)

  • 1. Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision.
    Tilney HS; Tekkis PP; Sains PS; Constantinides VA; Heriot AG;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jan; 50(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 17115338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
    Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of circumferential tumor location in clinical outcomes of rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision.
    Lee SH; Hernandez de Anda E; Finne CO; Madoff RD; Garcia-Aguilar J
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Dec; 48(12):2249-57. PubMed ID: 16400512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Immediate radical resection after local excision of rectal cancer: an oncologic compromise?
    Hahnloser D; Wolff BG; Larson DW; Ping J; Nivatvongs S
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Mar; 48(3):429-37. PubMed ID: 15747069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Prognostic analysis of middle and lower rectal cancer with different degrees of infiltration in mesorectum].
    Zhuo HQ; Zhou YB; Lü L; Zhou J; Yang WY; Li YJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 89(12):820-2. PubMed ID: 19595121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.
    den Dulk M; Marijnen CA; Putter H; Rutten HJ; Beets GL; Wiggers T; Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ
    Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 17592295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Multivariate prognostic analysis of patients with low and middle rectal cancer after curative resection].
    Li CS; Wan DS; Pan ZZ; Zhou ZW; Chen G; Wu XJ; Li LR; Lu ZH; Ding PR; Li Y
    Ai Zheng; 2006 May; 25(5):587-90. PubMed ID: 16687079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of circumferential resection margins on long-term outcomes following rectal cancer surgery.
    Tilney HS; Rasheed S; Northover JM; Tekkis PP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Oct; 52(10):1723-9. PubMed ID: 19966604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of resection of stage IV rectal cancer with mesorectal excision.
    Law WL; Chu KW
    J Surg Oncol; 2006 Jun; 93(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 16705728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?
    Reshef A; Lavery I; Kiran RP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Macroscopic assessment of mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a useful tool for improving quality control in a multidisciplinary team.
    García-Granero E; Faiz O; Muñoz E; Flor B; Navarro S; Faus C; García-Botello SA; Lledó S; Cervantes A
    Cancer; 2009 Aug; 115(15):3400-11. PubMed ID: 19479978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic significance of circumferential margin involvement in rectal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection.
    Luna-Pérez P; Bustos-Cholico E; Alvarado I; Maffuz A; Rodríguez-Ramírez S; Gutiérrez de la Barrera M; Labastida S
    J Surg Oncol; 2005 Apr; 90(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 15786412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multicenter study of outcome in relation to the type of resection in rectal cancer.
    Ortiz H; Wibe A; Ciga MA; Kreisler E; Garcia-Granero E; Roig JV; Biondo S;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Jul; 57(7):811-22. PubMed ID: 24901681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic groups in 1,676 patients with T3 rectal cancer treated without preoperative radiotherapy.
    Eriksen MT; Wibe A; Haffner J; Wiig JN;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Feb; 50(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 17180256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Jeyarajah S; Sutton CD; Miller AS; Hemingway D;
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):808-15. PubMed ID: 17441969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer depends on location of the tumor.
    Peschaud F; Cuenod CA; Benoist S; Julié C; Beauchet A; Siauve N; Taieb-Kasbi F; Penna C; Nordlinger B
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Aug; 48(8):1603-9. PubMed ID: 15937629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Wibe A; Rendedal PR; Svensson E; Norstein J; Eide TJ; Myrvold HE; Søreide O
    Br J Surg; 2002 Mar; 89(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 11872058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sacral resection for recurrent rectal cancer: analysis of morbidity and treatment results.
    Melton GB; Paty PB; Boland PJ; Healey JH; Savatta SG; Casas-Ganem JE; Guillem JG; Weiser MR; Cohen AM; Minsky BD; Wong WD; Temple LK
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Aug; 49(8):1099-107. PubMed ID: 16779712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of total mesorectal excision and of circumferential resection margin in local recurrence and survival of patients with rectal carcinoma.
    Tzardi M
    Dig Dis; 2007; 25(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 17384508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transanal excision vs. major surgery for T1 rectal cancer.
    Endreseth BH; Myrvold HE; Romundstad P; Hestvik UE; Bjerkeset T; Wibe A;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Jul; 48(7):1380-8. PubMed ID: 15906120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.