These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17115483)

  • 1. The Commerce Clause and federal abortion law: why progressives might be tempted to embrace federalism.
    Goldberg J
    Fordham Law Rev; 2006 Oct; 75(1):301-54. PubMed ID: 17115483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choosing balance: congressional powers and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
    Schecter A
    Fordham Law Rev; 2005 Mar; 73(4):1987-2206. PubMed ID: 15828129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states.
    Bradford CS
    Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech, privacy, and the power of the purse: lessons from the abortion "gag rule" case.
    Wing KR
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992; 17(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 1619248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The law of choice and choice of law: abortion, the right to travel, and extraterritorial regulation in American federalism.
    Kreimer SF
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 67(3):451-519. PubMed ID: 11656241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does the Thirteenth Amendment provide a jurisdictional basis for a federal ban on cloning?
    Vinck SC
    J Legis; 2003; 30(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 17256218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How the doctor got gagged. The disintegrating right of privacy in the physician-patient relationship.
    Sugarman J; Powers M
    JAMA; 1991 Dec; 266(23):3323-7. PubMed ID: 1960832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gaining a right to abortion in the United States and Canada: the role of judicial capacities.
    DeLorme L
    Berkeley J Sociol; 1991; 36():93-114. PubMed ID: 11656333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When the shouting has to stop: America and abortion.
    Economist; 1992 Apr; 323(7756):15-6. PubMed ID: 16001469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
    Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Casey reflections.
    Cavendish EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 16526134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization.
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases.
    Guggenheim M
    Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The unborn and the born again.
    New Repub; 1977 Jul; 177(27):5-6+. PubMed ID: 11663777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
    Weissmann R
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The United States Supreme Court and health law: the year in review.
    Ruger TW
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(3):611-5. PubMed ID: 16240742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2000.
    Arkes H
    Hum Life Rev; 2000; 26(4):15-26. PubMed ID: 12530369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.