561 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17115504)
1. Big abortion: what the antiabortion movement can learn from big tobacco.
Heminger JD
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2005; 54(4):1273-311. PubMed ID: 17115504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Air Force women's access to abortion services and the erosion of 10 U.S.C., section 1093.
Wilde ML
William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(3):351-412. PubMed ID: 15977327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention.
MacDougal D; Nasser WP
Haw Bar J; 1975; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
Bertz RC
West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Brief supports partial-birth abortion ban.
Catholic Church. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops [USCCB]
Origins; 2006 Jun; 36(4):58-63. PubMed ID: 16832962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproductive self-determination in the Third Circuit: the statutory proscription of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims as an unconstitutional violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey's undue burden standard.
Intromasso C
Womens Rights Law Report; 2003; 24(2):101-20. PubMed ID: 15568248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Review of abortion policy: legality, medicaid funding, and parental involvement, 1967-1994.
Merz JF; Jackson CA; Klerman JA
Womens Rights Law Report; 1995; 17(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11863033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.".
Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
Gordon A
Harvard J Legis; 2004; 41(2):501-15. PubMed ID: 16596750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. FDA regulation of tobacco.
Nitzkin JL
N Engl J Med; 2008 Nov; 359(19):2070; author reply 2070-1. PubMed ID: 18987378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The vagueness of partial-birth abortion bans: deconstruction or destruction?
Rurka ML
J Crim Law Criminol; 1999; 89(4):1233-68. PubMed ID: 14628850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Justices to review federal ban on disputed abortion method; case may hinge on Alito, Court's newest member.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 16514736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Exporting misery. A U.S. abortion ruling affects women's health worldwide.
Horgan J
Sci Am; 1991 Aug; 265(2):16, 18. PubMed ID: 1862327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
Joersz M
N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Tobacco control and free speech--an American dilemma.
Bayer R; Kelly M
N Engl J Med; 2010 Jan; 362(4):281-3. PubMed ID: 20071696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Stone AJ
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Constitutional law: further guidelines for abortion legislation.
Oklahoma Law Rev; 1976; 29(3):785-8. PubMed ID: 11664737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Banning partial-birth abortions: a few inches away from testing post-viability jurisprudence.
Flanagan PP
Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):141-77. PubMed ID: 16514753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Restrictions on women's right to abortion: informed consent, spousal consent, and record keeping provisions.
Karg B
Womens Rights Law Report; 1978; 5(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 11665035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
