These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1711590)

  • 1. Preoperative prediction of pathological tumor volume and stage in clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    McSherry SA; Levy F; Schiebler ML; Keefe B; Dent GA; Mohler JL
    J Urol; 1991 Jul; 146(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 1711590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound for screening.
    Palken M; Cobb OE; Simons CE; Warren BH; Aldape HC
    J Urol; 1991 Jan; 145(1):86-90; discussion 90-2. PubMed ID: 1701498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patients with abnormal ultrasound of the prostate but normal digital rectal examination should be classified as having clinical stage T2 tumors.
    Tiguert R; Gheiler EL; Grignon DJ; Littrup PJ; Sakr W; Pontes JE; Wood DP
    J Urol; 2000 May; 163(5):1486-90. PubMed ID: 10751863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transrectal ultrasound versus digital rectal examination for the staging of carcinoma of the prostate: results of a prospective, multi-institutional trial.
    Smith JA; Scardino PT; Resnick MI; Hernandez AD; Rose SC; Egger MJ
    J Urol; 1997 Mar; 157(3):902-6. PubMed ID: 9072596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen.
    Obek C; Louis P; Civantos F; Soloway MS
    J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):494-8; discussion 498-9. PubMed ID: 9915434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The value of transrectal MRI in the staging of localized prostate cancer].
    Pariente JL; Jacob F; Trillaud H; Deminiere C; Khan H; Ferrière JM; Grenier N; Le Guillou M
    Prog Urol; 1997 Jun; 7(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 9273074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, and multicoil magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer.
    Sanchez-Chapado M; Angulo JC; Ibarburen C; Aguado F; Ruiz A; Viaño J; García-Segura JM; Gonzalez-Esteban J; Rodriquez-Vallejo JM
    Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 9286643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The digital rectal exam, prostate-specific antigen and transrectal echography in the diagnosis of prostatic cancer].
    Martínez de Hurtado J; Chéchile Toniolo G; Villavicencio Mavrich H
    Arch Esp Urol; 1995 Apr; 48(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 7538749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Digital Rectal Examination and Serum Prostate Specific Antigen in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of 6,630 Men.
    Catalona WJ; Richie JP; Ahmann FR; Hudson MA; Scardino PT; Flanigan RC; DeKernion JB; Ratliff TL; Kavoussi LR; Dalkin BL; Waters WB; MacFarlane MT; Southwick PC
    J Urol; 2017 Feb; 197(2S):S200-S207. PubMed ID: 28012755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of transrectal ultrasound for identification of clinically undetected prostate cancer.
    Terris MK; Freiha FS; McNeal JE; Stamey TA
    J Urol; 1991 Jul; 146(1):78-83; discussion 83-4. PubMed ID: 1711589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preoperative prediction of tumor heterogeneity and recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostatic carcinoma with digital rectal, examination prostate specific antigen and the results of 6 systematic biopsies.
    Huland H; Hammerer P; Henke RP; Huland E
    J Urol; 1996 Apr; 155(4):1344-7. PubMed ID: 8632570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prostate cancer: correlation of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound and prostate specific antigen levels with tumor volumes in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Palken M; Cobb OE; Warren BH; Hoak DC
    J Urol; 1990 Jun; 143(6):1155-62. PubMed ID: 1692886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Staging accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging versus transrectal ultrasound in stages A and B prostatic cancer.
    Vapnek JM; Hricak H; Shinohara K; Popovich M; Carroll P
    Urol Int; 1994; 53(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 7855937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the digital rectal examination, endorectal ultrasound, and body coil magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
    Schiebler ML; McSherry S; Keefe B; Mittelstaedt CA; Mohler JL; Dent GA; McCartney WH
    Urol Radiol; 1991; 13(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 1897067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of prostate carcinoma staging: comparison of imaging and clinical methods.
    Huch Böni RA; Boner JA; Debatin JF; Trinkler F; Knönagel H; Von Hochstetter A; Helfenstein U; Krestin GP
    Clin Radiol; 1995 Sep; 50(9):593-600. PubMed ID: 7554732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of prostate specific antigen with prostate specific antigen density for 3 clinical applications.
    Shinohara K; Wolf JS; Narayan P; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 1994 Jul; 152(1):120-3. PubMed ID: 7515447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Manually controlled targeted prostate biopsy with real-time fusion imaging of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound: an early experience.
    Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Endo J; Hashida K; Tomonaga T; Nakano M; Sugiyama T; Tajiri T; Terachi T; Uchida T
    Int J Urol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 25316213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of rectal examination, transrectal echography, CAT and MRI in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma].
    Montorsi F; Guazzoni G; Consonni P; Colombo R; Nava L; Bergamaschi F; Scattoni V; Rigatti P
    Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl; 1991 Jun; 63 Suppl 2():143-5. PubMed ID: 1836654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concordance of preoperative prostate endorectal MRI with subsequent prostatectomy specimen in high-risk prostate cancer patients.
    Nepple KG; Rosevear HM; Stolpen AH; Brown JA; Williams RD
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):601-6. PubMed ID: 21665495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy by prostate specific antigen and transrectal ultrasound.
    Abi-Aad AS; Macfarlane MT; Stein A; deKernion JB
    J Urol; 1992 Mar; 147(3 Pt 2):952-5. PubMed ID: 1371567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.