These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17116291)
1. Cross-task repetition amnesia: Impaired recall of RSVP targets held in memory for a secondary task. Nieuwenstein MR; Johnson A; Kanai R; Martens S Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):319-33. PubMed ID: 17116291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The attentional blink reveals serial working memory encoding: evidence from virtual and human event-related potentials. Craston P; Wyble B; Chennu S; Bowman H J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 21(3):550-66. PubMed ID: 18564042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Temporal limits of selection and memory encoding: A comparison of whole versus partial report in rapid serial visual presentation. Nieuwenstein MR; Potter MC Psychol Sci; 2006 Jun; 17(6):471-5. PubMed ID: 16771795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation. Dux PE; Coltheart V; Harris IM Cognition; 2006 Apr; 99(3):355-82. PubMed ID: 15993401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blink and shrink: the effect of the attentional blink on spatial processing. Olivers CN; Olivers CN J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):613-31. PubMed ID: 15161390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An attentional blink for nontargets? Meng M; Potter MC Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):440-6. PubMed ID: 21264713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repetition blindness: out of sight or out of mind? Morris AL; Harris CL J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):913-22. PubMed ID: 15462629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention. Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Previous attentional set can induce an attentional blink with task-irrelevant initial targets. Thompson C; Underwood G; Crundall D Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Dec; 60(12):1603-9. PubMed ID: 17853197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of event-related potentials in attentional blink and repetition blindness. Koivisto M; Revonsuo A Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():115-26. PubMed ID: 18035339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The mechanism of priming: episodic retrieval or priming of pop-out? Becker SI Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):324-39. PubMed ID: 17868628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interfering with the central executive by means of a random interval repetition task. Vandierendonck A; De Vooght G; Van der Goten K Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 Feb; 51(1):197-218. PubMed ID: 9532967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attention blinks for selection, not perception or memory: reading sentences and reporting targets. Potter MC; Wyble B; Olejarczyk J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1915-23. PubMed ID: 22022894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repetition blindness has a perceptual locus: evidence from online processing of targets in RSVP streams. Johnston JC; Hochhaus L; Ruthruff E J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):477-89. PubMed ID: 11999868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The attention cascade model and attentional blink. Shih SI Cogn Psychol; 2008 May; 56(3):210-36. PubMed ID: 17624321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Depression-related differences in learning and forgetting responses to unrelated cues. Hertel PT; Mahan A Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Mar; 127(3):636-44. PubMed ID: 18164272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model? Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):736-49. PubMed ID: 16060777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Different attentional blink tasks reflect distinct information processing limitations: an individual differences approach. Kelly AJ; Dux PE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1867-73. PubMed ID: 22004195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of orthographic and phonological word length on memory for lists shown at RSVP and STM rates. Coltheart V; Mondy S; Dux PE; Stephenson L J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):815-26. PubMed ID: 15238026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]